Leo Strauss pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

簡體網頁||繁體網頁

☆☆☆☆☆

唐格維（Daniel Tanguay），渥太華大學哲學係副教授，政治學兼職教授。獲巴黎索邦大學哲學博士學位、DEA學位；濛特利爾大學哲學碩士；多米尼加學院哲學學士；拉瓦爾大學古典學學士。

林國榮，西南政法大學教師和首都師範大學博士研究生。

出版者:Yale University Press

作者:Daniel Tanguay

出品人:

頁數:272

译者:Christopher Nadon

出版時間:2007-4-28

價格:USD 32.00

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9780300109795

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

施特勞斯
政治哲學
politics
philosophy
biography
Strauss

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Since political theorist Leo Strauss' death in 1973, American interpreters have heatedly debated his intellectual legacy. Daniel Tanguay recovers Strauss from the atmosphere of partisan debate that has dominated American journalistic, political, and academic discussions of his work. Tanguay offers in crystal-clear prose the first assessment of the whole of Strauss' thought, a daunting task owing to the vastness and scope of Strauss' writings. This comprehensive overview of Strauss' thought is indispensable for anyone seeking to understand his philosophy and legacy. Tanguay gives special attention to Strauss' little-known formative years, 1920-1938, during which the philosopher elaborated the theme of his research, what he termed the 'theological-political problem'. Tanguay shows the connection of this theme to other major elements in Strauss' thought, such as the Quarrel between the Ancients and Moderns, the return to classical natural right, the art of esoteric writing, and his critique of modernity. In so doing, the author approaches what is at the heart of Strauss' work: "God and Politics". Rescuing Strauss from polemics and ill-defined generalizations about his ideas, Tanguay provides instead an important and timely analysis of a major philosophical thinker of the twentieth century.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

林国荣抄袭事件 http://philosophyol.com/pol/html/86/t-23386.html 看到有人评论说了一些低级错误，比如斯宾诺莎与中世纪什么的。而且发现林国荣这个人名似乎很熟悉，想起了胡文辉一篇《现代学人涉嫌剿袭举例》中提到过这个人。http://book.douban.com/review/3649384/ 我觉...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书中出现的翻译的问题，品质极差，已经超过学术可以容忍的范围。该书最多只能算是初稿，竟然堂而皇之地出版。作者的学术态度应该受到严重地质疑。今天在豆瓣看到有关这位译者剽窃论文的文章，虽不清楚事实真伪，但其人其事，可想而知。那篇文章呼吁译者”退出学界者“，看...

評分☆☆☆☆☆