What is it that we do when we enjoy a text? What is the pleasure of reading? The French critic and theorist Roland Barthes's answers to these questions constitute "perhaps for the first time in the history of criticism . . . not only a poetics of reading . . . but a much more difficult achievement, an erotics of reading . . . . Like filings which gather to form a figure in a magnetic field, the parts and pieces here do come together, determined to affirm the pleasure we must take in our reading as against the indifference of (mere) knowledge." --Richard Howard
評分
評分
評分
評分
OMG...巴特似乎把閱讀的快感直接等同於性快感瞭,居然還說閱讀彆人的批評就像是偷窺(voyeur),這個邏輯有點醉人啊。然而細看後覺得巴特的很多論點比較tricky,有時候過於主觀瞭,這本批評也許能解釋薩德式的寫作:writing as seduction, as a performance. 很認同Susan Sontag對此書的評論:Barthes repeatedly compared teaching to play, reading to eros, writing to seduction. The tiny book is constitued of personal essays rather than strictly-defined academic writing.
评分"喂喂喂,這種搞法,看書和找女人有甚麼區彆瞭."
评分“The text is never a "dialogue";no risk of feint, of aggression, of blackmail, no rivalry of ideolects; the text establishes a sort of islet within the human” 深得我心
评分Barthes Roland
评分"喂喂喂,這種搞法,看書和找女人有甚麼區彆瞭."
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有