Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁

Peter Collins

Mcgill Queens Univ Pr

1999-2

308

USD 32.95

Paperback

9780773517752

圖書標籤: 建築史建築建築理論思想史建築曆史與理論 Peter_Collins 設計王駿陽

喜歡 Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 的讀者還喜歡

下載链接在页面底部

點擊這裡下載

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製鏈接

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

发表于2024-11-04

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 電子書下載 2024

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載 2024

圖書描述

Explains what revivalism, rationalism, eclecticism, and functionalism meant to those who practiced them, explores the influence of the other arts and sciences on architectual theory, and analyzes notions that are commonly used in discussions about modern architecture. Infused with a deep sympathy for the 19th century, this text suggests that many 19th century ideas can be of real value to practising architects, particularly now that technology has made it possible to put them into effect properly. This second edition should be of interest not only to those who specialize in architecture and have read the standard work of Hitchcock, Giedion, Pevsner, and Joedicke - but also to those with a general interest in modern history and the philosophy of art.

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

著者簡介

圖書目錄

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載

想要找書就要到小哈圖書下載中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

用戶評價

評分☆☆☆☆☆

“現代建築中演變著的理想”

評分☆☆☆☆☆

for every reason this is a seminal work, for its erudition, its logical way of statement, its fair judgement(the author explicitly promotes stractural rationalist and functionalism, as well as the attention to the environment, but this doesn't inhibit his insight), and especially for its inspiration for the coming theorists

評分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以緻於我開始懷疑理念史

評分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以緻於我開始懷疑理念史

評分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以緻於我開始懷疑理念史