Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Peter Collins

Mcgill Queens Univ Pr

1999-2

308

USD 32.95

Paperback

9780773517752

图书标签: 建筑史建筑建筑理论思想史建筑历史与理论 Peter_Collins 设计王骏阳

喜欢 Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-09-10

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

Explains what revivalism, rationalism, eclecticism, and functionalism meant to those who practiced them, explores the influence of the other arts and sciences on architectual theory, and analyzes notions that are commonly used in discussions about modern architecture. Infused with a deep sympathy for the 19th century, this text suggests that many 19th century ideas can be of real value to practising architects, particularly now that technology has made it possible to put them into effect properly. This second edition should be of interest not only to those who specialize in architecture and have read the standard work of Hitchcock, Giedion, Pevsner, and Joedicke - but also to those with a general interest in modern history and the philosophy of art.

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

图书目录

Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture 1750-1950 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以致於我開始懷疑理念史

评分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以致於我開始懷疑理念史

评分☆☆☆☆☆

观念史

评分☆☆☆☆☆

for every reason this is a seminal work, for its erudition, its logical way of statement, its fair judgement(the author explicitly promotes stractural rationalist and functionalism, as well as the attention to the environment, but this doesn't inhibit his insight), and especially for its inspiration for the coming theorists

评分☆☆☆☆☆

寫得太好，以致於我開始懷疑理念史