Language, Truth and Logic pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Sir Alfred Jules Ayer (October 29, 1910 – June 27, 1989), better known as A. J. Ayer (or Freddie by his friends), was a British philosopher known for his promotion of logical positivism, particularly in his books Language, Truth and Logic (1936) and The Problem of Knowledge (1956).

Ayer was the Grote Professor of the Philosophy of Mind and Logic at the University College London from 1946 until 1959, when he became Wykeham Professor of Logic at Oxford University. He was knighted in 1970.

出版者:Penguin Books Ltd

作者:A. J. Ayer

出品人:

页数:208

译者:

出版时间:1990-4-26

价格:GBP 7.99

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780140136593

丛书系列:

图书标签:

哲学
分析哲学
艾耶尔
Philosophy
早期分析哲学
哲學
Truth
Logic

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Language, Truth and Logic, a work of philosophy by Alfred Jules Ayer, published in 1936) defines, explains and argues for the verification principle of logical positivism, sometimes referred to as the "criterion of significance" or "criterion of meaning". The treatise explains how the principle of verifiability may be applied to the problems and aims of philosophy.

The text has eight chapters, entitled: “Ch. I. The Elimination of Metaphysics,” “Ch. II. The Function of Philosophy,” “Ch. III. The Nature of Philosophical Analysis,” “Ch. IV. The A Priori,” “Ch. V. Truth and Probability,” “Ch. VI. Critique of Ethics and Theology,” “Ch. VII. The Self and the Common World,” “Ch. VIII. Solutions of Outstanding Philosophical Disputes.”

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

开始就说到了前提premise 那这么看重前提的"前提"又是什么呢实证主义基于sense-exprerience 正如超验主义基于intuition 肯定一方的同时不等于否定另一方吧最终他把拒斥形而上学的理由归结为"超验学说的没有文字意义"--no statement which refers to a "reality" of transcen...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书没法不给五星吧。这是一个伟人的气魄，如同读卢梭给我的感动。说他刻薄和搞笑的人就如同在忏悔录下评论卢梭全都是自命不凡的抱怨。我的叙事还是天才叙事，我会思考这是否不对，但这才是伟人们之所以闪光的原因，是一个人能够拥有的最美最好的属性。哲学即使是不去做过往...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

竟然没几个人评论？比较难读，还是有所收获，哪怕一知半解。只看逻辑实证主义的概念是没意义的。作者的推理和论证是比较吸引人的，虽然读的过程中老是感觉反应迟钝。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

首先声明是一家之言，写这篇东西的人是狗眼。这套丛书的大部分都收了，也没顾得上评价如何或者翻译如何，大概是出于对译文出版社的信赖吧，但是看了其中几本，对照英文版后顿觉翻译很不尽如人意...不废话，先拿这本书说吧，作为沿着哲学史进入分析哲学的入门书，这本书的翻译...

评分☆☆☆☆☆