Herb Sutter,ISO C++标准委员会主席,C++ Users Journal杂志特邀编辑和专栏作家;他目前在微软公司领导NET环境下C++浯言扩展的设计工作除本书外.他还撰写了三本广受赞誉的图书:Exceptional C++ Style、Exceptional C++和More Exceptional C++。 .
Andrei Alexandrescu,世界顶级的C++专家.“C++ Users Journal杂志的专栏作家,他的Modem C++ Design—书曾荣获2001年最佳C++图朽称号.书中所开发的Loki已经成为最负盛名的C++程序库之一。
Consistent, high-quality coding standards improve software quality, reduce time-to-market, promote teamwork, eliminate time wasted on inconsequential matters, and simplify maintenance. Now, two of the world's most respected C++ experts distill the rich collective experience of the global C++ community into a set of coding standards that every developer and development team can understand and use as a basis for their own coding standards. The authors cover virtually every facet of C++ programming: design and coding style, functions, operators, class design, inheritance, construction/destruction, copying, assignment, namespaces, modules, templates, genericity, exceptions, STL containers and algorithms, and more. Each standard is described concisely, with practical examples. From type definition to error handling, this book presents C++ best practices, including some that have only recently been identified and standardized-techniques you may not know even if you've used C++ for years. Along the way, you'll find answers to questions like * What's worth standardizing--and what isn't? * What are the best ways to code for scalability?* What are the elements of a rational error handling policy? * How (and why) do you avoid unnecessary initialization, cyclic, and definitional dependencies?* When (and how) should you use static and dynamic polymorphism together?* How do you practice "safe" overriding?* When should you provide a no-fail swap? * Why and how should you prevent exceptions from propagating across module boundaries?* Why shouldn't you write namespace declarations or directives in a header file?* Why should you use STL vector and string instead of arrays?* How do you choose the right STL search or sort algorithm?* What rules should you follow to ensure type-safe code? Whether you're working alone or with others, C++ Coding Standards will help you write cleaner code--and write it faster, with fewer hassles and less frustration.
本评论转自我的Blog 转载必须包含本声明、保持本文完整。并以超链形式注明作者编程随想和本文原始地址: http://program-think.blogspot.com/2009/01/cxx-coding-standards-101-rules.html 全书的101个条款分布在如下的12部分中,下面来挨个介绍一下。 1、组织与策略 这部分...
评分温故而知新,重新复习一些C++的知识,有一段时间,出现了非常多关于C++编程规范类型的书籍。这些类型的书籍,很大部分内容是相同的,个人比较喜欢看《C++编程规范》,100条,条款来自《Effective C++》、《More Effective C++》、《Effective STL》、《Exceptional C++》、《Mo...
评分我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看...
评分我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看过了 我看...
评分[2018.10 更新] 关键字: 面向对象设计 (OOD), 封装性 (encapsulation), 抽象 (abstraction), 不变式 (invariants), 分离编译 (separate compilation), pImpl 惯用法, 聚合类 (aggregate class), 静态检查 (static checking), SOLID 原则, 替换原则 (Liskov substitution princ...
水平不够,examples的论证太弱又不想去满地翻quotation,结果就是不少观点都不明所以。
评分零零碎碎20天读完了。很有实战意义的一本书。
评分C++编码经验之谈
评分水平不够,examples的论证太弱又不想去满地翻quotation,结果就是不少观点都不明所以。
评分脱离入门必备 之一
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有