 
			 
				"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
九零年左右出生的人成长于这样的一种文化氛围之下:先是日本动漫的风靡,再到平民偶像的崛起,最后是当今网络文化的全面普及。七八十年代的由知识分子主导的诗意生活与民主热情已在一次激昂而又成为禁忌的副歌中随风远去,取而代之的是一种渗透全社会的,从大学生到初中辍学者...
评分阿多诺的启蒙或启蒙批判 [摘 要] 表面上看,启蒙运动的企图早已实现了。如果启蒙完成以前的世界在启蒙的推动者眼里是草率和嬗变的话,那么他们需要做的首要工作就是阻止这种草率和嬗变继续下去。启蒙开始前,世界的神话幻想没有连贯性,也不具有让它长期保持和谐一致的特性...
评分 评分On Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno primarily provides a thorough self-critique of the revisionist version of enlightenment by enlightenment itself. ...
评分在我们生存的时代,大众文化已经如微尘般每时每刻地漂浮在周遭的空气里。我们沉浸在大众文化中,更多的时候已经对它熟视无睹。然而,就在一片昏昏然中,作为消费品的大众文化竟反客为主,成为驾驭人类理性的工具。 多数大众对此或许是不屑一顾的,但欺骗的神话正在真实地上演...
OK,我用自己的话把第一章翻译了一遍,但是仍然是感觉要梳理清楚批判理论的前因后果真是不容易啊!
评分用“不明觉厉”来形容这本极度艰涩的书中的某些理论实在是再适合不过了,而且平心而论有些地方是比较牵强的……难道是我觉悟不够……?
评分难得一比
评分睡前催眠读物
评分有1944年校勘,做得很好。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有