"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
这是我十年前读到的第一本西方马克思主义文化批判作品。后来出了新版,阿多尔诺部分是曹卫东翻译的,虽然没读过这个版本,但看到有人说与原文对照的话能看出曹卫东翻译得不好,我不懂德文,无从判断。我看的这个版本(洪佩郁, 蔺月峰译)也是从德文译出的,但多用短句翻译(译...
评分这是我十年前读到的第一本西方马克思主义文化批判作品。后来出了新版,阿多尔诺部分是曹卫东翻译的,虽然没读过这个版本,但看到有人说与原文对照的话能看出曹卫东翻译得不好,我不懂德文,无从判断。我看的这个版本(洪佩郁, 蔺月峰译)也是从德文译出的,但多用短句翻译(译...
评分在《资本论》中,马克思表达了这样一个论题:资本具有天然的逐利性,社会上哪个行业赚钱,资本就会像潮水般涌过去。社会中的资本具有一种特殊的能力:它所到之处就会使原来美好的事物遭到贬损,因为它抽离了传统社会中各种内在价值,取而代之的交换价值。资本的不断扩散,其实...
评分霍克海默与阿尔多诺的名作《启蒙辩证法》(the Dialectic of Enlightenment)代表了法兰克福学派对启蒙运动及受其深厚影响的现代社会之批判。法兰克福学派作为西方马克思主义的代表在欧陆战争后与第三国际式的马列主义分道扬镳。作为一个放弃了直接暴力革命与无产阶级独裁的学派...
评分有人说这本书写得神神叨叨,但一定程度上这不是作者的错而是译者的错。这本书的翻译可以说错谬非常多,很多地方读中译全不可解,读英译才能明白。 译者自称是按照英文译的,又经过德文的校对,但有些地方中译与英译的意思竟然完全相反,而根据上下文只有按照英译的意思才能顺畅...
2017-9 於圖書館九樓南
评分!!!
评分忽然就觉得多少可以解释为什么天朝大众如此热爱看无脑综艺和国产剧,大概是因为这些精心推敲过套路、拿捏着人的笑点及其频率的节目真的可以让被严重剥削的劳动人民在工作与工作的间隙里迅速回血且逐步放弃思考的自觉——一切的目的只是为了成为更适应生产的螺丝钉。或许从来没有哪个社会形态会如此无孔不入而悄无声息地渗透统治阶级的意识形态,成功化矛盾于无形。这大概也解释了为什么无产阶级并没有成为历史的执行者,共产主义也终究无法到来。
评分忽然就觉得多少可以解释为什么天朝大众如此热爱看无脑综艺和国产剧,大概是因为这些精心推敲过套路、拿捏着人的笑点及其频率的节目真的可以让被严重剥削的劳动人民在工作与工作的间隙里迅速回血且逐步放弃思考的自觉——一切的目的只是为了成为更适应生产的螺丝钉。或许从来没有哪个社会形态会如此无孔不入而悄无声息地渗透统治阶级的意识形态,成功化矛盾于无形。这大概也解释了为什么无产阶级并没有成为历史的执行者,共产主义也终究无法到来。
评分大字报
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有