In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
希腊理性的开端确实可以被描述为自然与习俗的对立。然而,企图为习俗寻找自然基础的努力,或者企图彰显自然与习俗之张力的努力,并不等于建立自然法的努力。如果我们把城邦视做事行(action)的中心,那么古希腊的三大言辞(speech)对自然提出了三种稍微不同的理解:哲学家口...
評分 評分列奥.施特劳斯精神气质酷似背教者尤利安,欣赏古典共和国的刚健朴实,向往醇厚民德未被浇浞风气污染的年代,否则也不会在《关于马基雅维利的思考》开篇赞颂美利坚合众国的共和政体,批评马基雅维利传播邪恶的知识败坏人心,然而哲人的阶级位置,使得他与卢梭一样,无法真正理解...
評分 評分隻讀瞭前兩章。。該是讀過的最難懂的瞭。。
评分思想質地和論說力度比阿倫特差得太遠瞭。不是心平氣和,而是東扯西拉,念叨兩句口號。從頭到尾仔細讀完,幾乎催生齣瞭強迫癥哎。
评分????5/29/20
评分其實並不教條
评分思想質地和論說力度比阿倫特差得太遠瞭。不是心平氣和,而是東扯西拉,念叨兩句口號。從頭到尾仔細讀完,幾乎催生齣瞭強迫癥哎。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有