Natural Right and History pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.

出版者:University Of Chicago Press

作者:Leo Strauss

出品人:

頁數:336

译者:

出版時間:15 October, 1965

價格:USD 21.00

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780226776941

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

政治哲學
施特勞斯
哲學
思想史
Strauss
LeoStrauss
列奧·施特勞斯
政治

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965 B. Locke At first glance Locke seems to reject altogether Hobbes's notion of natural law and to follow the traditional teaching. 【总论点：洛克对霍布斯的隐蔽继承】 Yet Lo...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

“Natural right—Natural rights—Human right—Liberty/Freedom：这一演变过程是现代性通过反叛古典完成的。” ——题记一．自然权利、善及二者关系源流考善是什么？自然权利又是什么？这是古典政治哲学家们一直在追问的问题。他们认为，善的生活，就是人的自然喜好...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

思想質地和論說力度比阿倫特差得太遠瞭。不是心平氣和，而是東扯西拉，念叨兩句口號。從頭到尾仔細讀完，幾乎催生齣瞭強迫癥哎。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

思想質地和論說力度比阿倫特差得太遠瞭。不是心平氣和，而是東扯西拉，念叨兩句口號。從頭到尾仔細讀完，幾乎催生齣瞭強迫癥哎。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

This is actually a book about Political Theology

评分☆☆☆☆☆

THE classic on the debate between ancients and moderns on natural right/law. The best chapter, it seems to me, is the third one on the discovery of nature and its preconditions - worthy of comparison with his teacher Heidegger's "ontological" or "ontic" take.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

文筆不錯