John Rawls was James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard University. He was recipient of the 1999 National Humanities Medal.
The Law of Peoples John Rawls This book consists of two parts: the essay "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," first published in 1997, and "The Law of Peoples," a major reworking of a much shorter article by the same name published in 1993. Taken together, they are the culmination of more than fifty years of reflection on liberalism and on some of the most pressing problems of our times by John Rawls. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited" explains why the constraints of public reason, a concept first discussed in Political Liberalism (1993), are ones that holders of both religious and non-religious comprehensive views can reasonably endorse. It is Rawls's most detailed account of how a modern constitutional democracy, based on a liberal political conception, could and would be viewed as legitimate by reasonable citizens who on religious, philosophical, or moral grounds do not themselves accept a liberal comprehensive doctrine--such as that of Kant, or Mill, or Rawls's own "Justice as Fairness," presented in A Theory of Justice (1971). The Law of Peoples extends the idea of a social contract to the Society of Peoples and lays out the general principles that can and should be accepted by both liberal and non-liberal societies as the standard for regulating their behavior toward one another. In particular, it draws a crucial distinction between basic human rights and the rights of each citizen of a liberal constitutional democracy. It explores the terms under which such a society may appropriately wage war against an "outlaw society," and discusses the moral grounds for rendering assistance to non-liberal societies burdened by unfavorable political and economic conditions. John Rawls is James Bryant Conant University Professor, Emeritus, Harvard University, and the author of A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (see catalog page 32) and Collected Papers (Harvard). 51Z2 x 81Z4 256 pp.
1.对非西方人的描述有强烈的“他者”气味。我不相信民族的不同会让亚洲人和欧洲人有什么思想上的差异,就像欧洲人也不相信英格兰人和苏格兰人有什么思想上的差异是因为民族的不同而引起。 2.正派的等级制国家本身就是一个虚假的概念,任何一种正派都不应该建立在结构性压迫上。...
评分Rawls是20世纪重要的政治哲学家,他构建了一个接纳不理想的社会的公民共同构建和平平等社会的政治理想。其《万民法》是一本构建现实乌托邦的书,从许多其他哲学思想比如康德的永久和平(Perpetual Peace),卢梭的社会契约论(The Social Contract )延伸扩展,假设由一群自由...
评分Rawls是20世纪重要的政治哲学家,他构建了一个接纳不理想的社会的公民共同构建和平平等社会的政治理想。其《万民法》是一本构建现实乌托邦的书,从许多其他哲学思想比如康德的永久和平(Perpetual Peace),卢梭的社会契约论(The Social Contract )延伸扩展,假设由一群自由...
评分1.对非西方人的描述有强烈的“他者”气味。我不相信民族的不同会让亚洲人和欧洲人有什么思想上的差异,就像欧洲人也不相信英格兰人和苏格兰人有什么思想上的差异是因为民族的不同而引起。 2.正派的等级制国家本身就是一个虚假的概念,任何一种正派都不应该建立在结构性压迫上。...
评分与原版对照着读的。 译者完全思维混乱,很多句子可以用更易懂更通俗的语言,在忠于原文的情况下表达出来。 莫非这种学术类书籍也有学科文字模式壁垒? 真可笑。
上学期读Rawls的theory of justice就很痛苦,据教授说这本容易理解一些,可依然很痛苦。作者将civil society对于个人的laws extend到a society of peoples 上,相当于从domestic到international(但又不是因为不是state而是peoples)。具体待补
评分罗尔斯用正义论希望告诉人们他有良知,用民之公法希望宣称自己还有点智商,最后让人们看到,在这个时代里,当个混子是多么地利人利己
评分记得一个H大社会学教授(好像叫荷马斯,在soc psy很有名)在评论蒙田的现代功绩时曾拐弯抹角地讽刺了他的畅销书同事罗尔斯,说他的‘正义理论’本质上混淆了‘应然’和‘实然’。在这‘遗嘱’《人人法》里,Rawls换口吻说这些个理想只是概率上‘可以然’的。对于这种realistic utopian的理所当然,我不得不有些decently不以为然。spring 2010 perkins window shopping草草读毕(w/ decency, if not liberalness!)
评分上学期读Rawls的theory of justice就很痛苦,据教授说这本容易理解一些,可依然很痛苦。作者将civil society对于个人的laws extend到a society of peoples 上,相当于从domestic到international(但又不是因为不是state而是peoples)。具体待补
评分草草的读完了...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有