John Rawls was James Bryant Conant University Professor at Harvard University. He was recipient of the 1999 National Humanities Medal.
The Law of Peoples John Rawls This book consists of two parts: the essay "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," first published in 1997, and "The Law of Peoples," a major reworking of a much shorter article by the same name published in 1993. Taken together, they are the culmination of more than fifty years of reflection on liberalism and on some of the most pressing problems of our times by John Rawls. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited" explains why the constraints of public reason, a concept first discussed in Political Liberalism (1993), are ones that holders of both religious and non-religious comprehensive views can reasonably endorse. It is Rawls's most detailed account of how a modern constitutional democracy, based on a liberal political conception, could and would be viewed as legitimate by reasonable citizens who on religious, philosophical, or moral grounds do not themselves accept a liberal comprehensive doctrine--such as that of Kant, or Mill, or Rawls's own "Justice as Fairness," presented in A Theory of Justice (1971). The Law of Peoples extends the idea of a social contract to the Society of Peoples and lays out the general principles that can and should be accepted by both liberal and non-liberal societies as the standard for regulating their behavior toward one another. In particular, it draws a crucial distinction between basic human rights and the rights of each citizen of a liberal constitutional democracy. It explores the terms under which such a society may appropriately wage war against an "outlaw society," and discusses the moral grounds for rendering assistance to non-liberal societies burdened by unfavorable political and economic conditions. John Rawls is James Bryant Conant University Professor, Emeritus, Harvard University, and the author of A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition (see catalog page 32) and Collected Papers (Harvard). 51Z2 x 81Z4 256 pp.
与原版对照着读的。 译者完全思维混乱,很多句子可以用更易懂更通俗的语言,在忠于原文的情况下表达出来。 莫非这种学术类书籍也有学科文字模式壁垒? 真可笑。
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
评分与原版对照着读的。 译者完全思维混乱,很多句子可以用更易懂更通俗的语言,在忠于原文的情况下表达出来。 莫非这种学术类书籍也有学科文字模式壁垒? 真可笑。
评分【按语:一个类似于康德《论永久和平》的道德政治方案,不过更具有现实主义色彩,所以是realistic utopia。康德的自由国家联盟其实只是对普世国家的现实主义替代,但Rawls的人民社会完全抛弃了普世国家理想,并且将正派而不自由的社会也接纳为完全成员。仍然采纳了原初状态来论...
哲学家写国际关系真的很匪夷所思,不仅太过理想主义而且也只是浅薄的延伸自己在domestic social justice的理论 ---- 写不出paper太难受了
评分非母语一本本看英文还是不够快,偷懒看的中文,有疑惑才对照一下原本。
评分怎么会有这样的“dry reading”,看得从灵魂到身体都干燥了,口干舌燥,欲望丧失。 没事不要读哲学。 一本关于乌托邦的书,从许多其他哲学思想比如foedus pacificum (永久和平),The Social Contract(卢梭的社会契约论)延伸扩展,假设自由而正派的人民创造万民法,探讨civic society(人民社会,公民社会?)之可能性。
评分哲学家写国际关系真的很匪夷所思,不仅太过理想主义而且也只是浅薄的延伸自己在domestic social justice的理论 ---- 写不出paper太难受了
评分草草的读完了...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有