The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiments to answer this question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"
Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the concept of familiar strangers.
作者用实验证明,艾希曼不是一个可怕的恶魔,而只是一个进入代理状态的,盲从权威的没有激情的官僚。当进入此种状态时,个人不再认为应该对自己的行为负责,而是将自己定义为执行他人意愿的工具。 实际上,这种盲从权威的倾向;即有进化上原因,也与人类的成长环境密切相关。无...
评分 评分1 1960年,纳粹头目阿道夫.艾希曼被以色列特工抓获,押往耶路撒冷接受审迅。艾希曼是纳粹德国高官,曾在二战期间,犯下了滔天罪行。他签发了很多骇人听闻的文件,包括对数万犹太人执行死亡命令,可以说是一个双手沾满了鲜血的刽子手。 那这样一位恶贯满盈的战犯站在军事法庭审...
评分读完这本《对权威的服从》,我和著作者一样都对这个实验结果失望不已。人们是那么服从权威,又那么难以反抗。可是当我们愤愤不平指责那些历史罪人,尤其是“刽子手”身份的人时,读完这本书,也不免产生了一丝的同情和怜悯。 犯错的究竟是谁?如果仅仅只是权威人物发号施令,但...
评分在了解自己之后,我对人”性本善“是持怀疑态度的,因为很多时候自己的想法和行为都在暴露出你不是一个好人,虽然没有做出什么伤天害理的行为,但以小窥大,从0到1的跨越其实并不是特别困难,在没有知道“艾希曼”这个名字和”米尔格拉姆实验“,”斯坦福监狱实验“之前,我也...
stunning piece
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
评分執手相看淚眼。
评分第一次一天读完一本英文书,也是读过最负能量的一本书。我个人更倾向于服从是个人道德感中的个体层面让步于集体层面的一个例子。从进化的观念讲,这种群体道德感也是有利于群体延续的。下一步应该思考的是权威的服从者应该承担多少责任?另外,我不太认同作者的实验伦理。他认为这种情感压力是被者的个人选择的结果,而我认为这种压力恰恰在于被试者需要做出选择本身。真是既无beneficiary也无consentment。
评分Coursera的social phychology里面看到的
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有