Obedience to Authority

Obedience to Authority pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the concept of familiar strangers.

出版者:HarpPerenM
作者:Stanley Milgram
出品人:
页数:256
译者:
出版时间:2004
价格:USD 14.95
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780060737283
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 心理学 
  • Psychology 
  • 社会学 
  • 心理學 
  • 服从权威 
  • 社会 
  • 英文原版 
  • 政治学 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.

The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiments to answer this question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"

具体描述

读后感

评分

作者用实验证明,艾希曼不是一个可怕的恶魔,而只是一个进入代理状态的,盲从权威的没有激情的官僚。当进入此种状态时,个人不再认为应该对自己的行为负责,而是将自己定义为执行他人意愿的工具。 实际上,这种盲从权威的倾向;即有进化上原因,也与人类的成长环境密切相关。无...  

评分

作者用实验证明,艾希曼不是一个可怕的恶魔,而只是一个进入代理状态的,盲从权威的没有激情的官僚。当进入此种状态时,个人不再认为应该对自己的行为负责,而是将自己定义为执行他人意愿的工具。 实际上,这种盲从权威的倾向;即有进化上原因,也与人类的成长环境密切相关。无...  

评分

握住“刀”的“手”和控制“手”的“脑” “手”的冷漠,麻木,侥幸,暗喜 “脑”的旁观,重复,权威,架空 一鼓作气,再而衰,三而竭 底线的一次次试探与屈从 责任的一遍遍推卸与妥协 “手”本也有自己的想法,却被“脑”一步步控制成了机械动作 善良也可作恶,软弱逃不过悲凉...  

评分

1.纳粹刽子手在公审时为自己大屠杀犹太人辩护:执行上级命令无罪。 2.这引发了作者思考:上级下达的命令是伤天害理的反人道的,应该服从吗?正常人在权威指示下,会做出什么程度的恶行?道德和良知能否抵抗权威的指令? 3.作者设计了这样的实验:对外宣称,研究体罚是否可以提...  

评分

在了解自己之后,我对人”性本善“是持怀疑态度的,因为很多时候自己的想法和行为都在暴露出你不是一个好人,虽然没有做出什么伤天害理的行为,但以小窥大,从0到1的跨越其实并不是特别困难,在没有知道“艾希曼”这个名字和”米尔格拉姆实验“,”斯坦福监狱实验“之前,我也...  

用户评价

评分

第一次一天读完一本英文书,也是读过最负能量的一本书。我个人更倾向于服从是个人道德感中的个体层面让步于集体层面的一个例子。从进化的观念讲,这种群体道德感也是有利于群体延续的。下一步应该思考的是权威的服从者应该承担多少责任?另外,我不太认同作者的实验伦理。他认为这种情感压力是被者的个人选择的结果,而我认为这种压力恰恰在于被试者需要做出选择本身。真是既无beneficiary也无consentment。

评分

Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?

评分

執手相看淚眼。

评分

有趣的实验

评分

Coursera的social phychology里面看到的

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有