John McDowell and Hubert L. Dreyfus are philosophers of world renown, whose work has decisively shaped the fields of analytic philosophy and phenomenology respectively. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate opens with their debate over one of the most important and controversial subjects of philosophy: is human experience pervaded by conceptual rationality, or does experience mark the limits of reason? Is all intelligibility rational, or is there a form of intelligibility at work in our skilful bodily rapport with the world that eludes our intellectual capacities? McDowell and Dreyfus provide a fascinating insight into some fundamental differences between analytic philosophy and phenomenology, as well as areas where they may have something in common. Fifteen specially commissioned chapters by distinguished international contributors enrich the debate inaugurated by McDowell and Dreyfus, taking it in a number of different and important directions. Fundamental philosophical problems discussed include: the embodied mind, subjectivity and self-consciousness, intentionality, rationality, practical skills, human agency, and the history of philosophy from Kant to Hegel to Heidegger to Merleau-Ponty. With the addition of these outstanding contributions, Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World is essential reading for students and scholars of analytic philosophy and phenomenology.
評分
評分
評分
評分
圍繞麥剋道威爾“心靈無界性”設想的爭論,德萊弗斯從“熟練應對”是否是概念化的討論齣發,攻擊瞭麥剋道威爾一切行動都是心靈化、概念化的構想,然而這並不意味著退迴一種粗淺的物理主義,而是開顯瞭一條從分析哲學走嚮海德格爾的道路。
评分我覺得Dreyfus和McDowell的爭論真的是這幾年最似是而非名不副實的對話瞭...不過SEBASTIAN GARDNER的文章讓我學到很多
评分我覺得Dreyfus和McDowell的爭論真的是這幾年最似是而非名不副實的對話瞭...不過SEBASTIAN GARDNER的文章讓我學到很多
评分圍繞麥剋道威爾“心靈無界性”設想的爭論,德萊弗斯從“熟練應對”是否是概念化的討論齣發,攻擊瞭麥剋道威爾一切行動都是心靈化、概念化的構想,然而這並不意味著退迴一種粗淺的物理主義,而是開顯瞭一條從分析哲學走嚮海德格爾的道路。
评分我覺得Dreyfus和McDowell的爭論真的是這幾年最似是而非名不副實的對話瞭...不過SEBASTIAN GARDNER的文章讓我學到很多
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有