That discrimination exists in courts of law is beyond dispute. In American murder cases, for instance, studies show that blacks who kill a white are much more likely to receive the death penalty than if they kill a black. Indeed, in Georgia, they are 30 times more likely to be condemned, and in Texas a staggering 90 times more likely. Conversely, in Texas, of 143 whites convicted of killing a black, only one was sentenced to die. But how extensive is discrimination in the courtroom? Is it strictly a matter of racial prejudice, or does it respond to a wide range of social factors?
In Sociological Justice, eminent legal sociologist Donald Black challenges the conventional notion that law is primarily an affair of rules and that discrimination is an aberration. Law, he contends, is a social process in which bias is inherent. Indeed, Black goes well beyond the documented instances of racial discrimination to show how social status (regardless of race), the degree of intimacy (are they family members, friends, or complete strangers?), speech, organization, and numerous other factors all greatly influence whether a complaint will be filed in court, who will win, and what the punishment or other remedy will be. Moreover, he extends his analysis to include not only the litigants, but also the lawyers, the jurors, and the judge, describing how their social characteristics can also influence a case.
Sociological Justice introduces a new field of legal scholarship that will have important consequences for the future of law: the sociology of the case. Black discusses how lawyers can use the sociology of the case to improve their practice and, for those interested in reform, he suggests ways to minimize bias in the courtroom. Beyond this, Black demonstrates that modern jurisprudence, with its assumption that like cases will be treated in like fashion, is out of touch with reality. He urges the adoption of a new sociological jurisprudence, with a new morality of law, that explicitly addresses the social relativity of justice. A major contribution to legal scholarship, this thought-provoking volume is essential reading for anyone interested in law and justice in modern society.
Don Black, OBE (born 21 June 1938) is an English lyricist. His works have included numerous musicals, movie themes and hit songs. He has provided lyrics for John Barry, Charles Strouse, Andrew Lloyd Webber, Quincy Jones, Jule Styne, Henry Mancini, Michael Jackson, Elmer Bernstein, Michel Legrand, Hayley Westenra, A. R. Rahman and Marvin Hamlisch.
Donald Black is University Professor of the Social Sciences at the University of Virginia, and has taught legal sociology at both Harvard and Yale Law Schools. He has published four other books, including the highly acclaimed The Behavior of Law, which Contemporary Sociology called "the most important contribution ever made to the sociology of law."
评分
评分
评分
评分
我必须承认,这本书的叙事方式相当具有挑战性,它更像是一场与作者的深度对话,而不是一次轻松愉快的阅读体验。它没有迎合大众的阅读习惯,而是直接将读者置于一个充满思辨的场域之中。书中的一些论证链条非常长,需要读者保持极高的专注度才能跟上作者的思路,稍有分神,可能就会错过一个至关重要的转折点。我特别欣赏作者在构建每一个论点时所展现出的那种近乎偏执的细致,仿佛每一个词语的选择都经过了千锤百炼。其中关于“身份政治”与“集体能动性”相互作用的章节,简直是令人拍案叫绝的精彩,它没有简单地站队,而是深入挖掘了两者在现实张力中的微妙平衡与冲突点。这种不满足于表面现象的深度挖掘,使得这本书超越了一般的社会评论,更像是一份对人类社会演化历程的深刻体悟。读完之后,你会感觉自己的认知边界被拓宽了,看待问题的角度也变得更加多维和立体,这绝对是一本需要反复咀嚼才能体会其真味的著作。
评分这本书的排版和装帧给我留下了极佳的第一印象,纸张的选择非常考究,拿在手里有一种沉甸甸的质感,这让阅读体验得到了质的提升。内容上,作者展现出了一种罕见的跨学科视野,他能够自如地在历史学、哲学、人类学和当代政治理论之间游走,构建起一个宏大的分析框架。我尤其被其中关于“公共领域衰退”的论述所打动,作者没有停留在对现状的抱怨,而是细致地剖析了技术进步如何在不经意间重塑了我们的交流模式和权力结构,这种对技术与社会互动关系的洞察力,显得非常超前和深刻。整本书的行文速度是平稳而坚定的,没有太多戏剧性的起伏,但却以一种潜移默化的方式,持续地挑战着读者的既有认知。这是一种慢热但后劲十足的作品,读完合上书本的那一刻,你会发现自己对许多曾经司空见惯的社会现象,已经有了完全不同的理解和审视目光。
评分坦白说,这本书的切入点非常独特,它似乎避开了那些已经被谈论得太多、近乎陈词滥调的社会议题,而是选择了一个更侧重于理论建构和概念深化的方向。作者对于某些核心概念的界定和重新阐释,非常具有启发性,他成功地为一些模糊不清的社会现象找到了更精确的语言载体。在阅读过程中,我频繁地停下来,不是因为看不懂,而是因为那些句子结构精妙,内涵丰富,需要我回味再三,甚至在笔记本上做一些自己的概念图示来辅助理解。书中对全球化背景下地方性经验的考察尤其精彩,它成功地将宏大叙事与微观个体经验巧妙地编织在一起,让读者既能感受到全球体系的巨大压力,也能体会到个体在其中挣扎求存的真实状态。这本书的价值在于,它提供了一整套全新的思维工具,而不是简单的答案,它教会我们如何更具批判性和同理心地去理解我们所生活的世界及其内在的复杂性与不公。
评分初翻这本书时,我最先注意到的是它在语言运用上的那种古典而又充满力量感的风格。作者似乎刻意避免了当下流行读物中那种快餐式的、高度口语化的表达,转而采用了一种更具学理色彩的、结构严谨的句式,这使得阅读过程带有一种仪式感。在处理一些敏感的社会议题时,作者的处理方式显得尤为老辣和圆融,他并不急于下结论,而是像一位高明的棋手,步步为营地铺陈事实、引用数据,最终让结论自然而然地浮现出来,让读者有种“原来如此”的豁然开朗感。尤其是关于代际差异在社会资源继承模式中的影响分析,那段论述的逻辑严密程度,简直能与最顶尖的经济学论文相媲美,但同时又保持了极佳的可读性,没有丝毫的枯燥感。我强烈推荐给那些对社会结构性问题抱有浓厚兴趣,并且不畏惧阅读长篇复杂论述的读者,它提供的思想养分是实实在在的,能够支撑起长期的思考。
评分这本书的封面设计真是引人注目,那种深邃的蓝色调配上烫金的字体,立刻就给人一种沉甸甸、有分量的感觉,让人忍不住想翻开一探究竟。我最初被它吸引,是因为我对当代社会结构中那些微妙的权力分配和资源不均现象有着强烈的求知欲。带着这样的期待,我投入了阅读,希望能在这本书里找到一些关于我们这个复杂社会运作逻辑的深度剖析。阅读的过程本身就是一种智力上的探险,作者似乎擅长用一种近乎散文诗的笔触去描绘宏大的社会议题,文字的节奏感把握得非常好,时而舒缓细腻,时而又戛然而止,留给人充分的思考空间。那种感觉就像是跟随一位经验丰富的向导,穿行于我们日常生活中那些习以为常却又充满矛盾的角落。特别是书中对于某些历史案例的梳理,那种严谨的文献引用和逻辑推演,体现了作者扎实的学术功底,使得即便是最抽象的理论也变得触手可及,让人在脑海中构建起一个清晰的知识框架。这本书无疑提供了一个绝佳的平台,让我们得以从一个全新的、更具批判性的角度重新审视我们所处的环境和我们彼此之间的关系。
评分整本书可以用一句中文来总结:关系很重要。
评分整本书可以用一句中文来总结:关系很重要。
评分很有意思的一本书
评分整本书可以用一句中文来总结:关系很重要。
评分整本书可以用一句中文来总结:关系很重要。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有