It is frustrating that Sartre, a highly systematic philosopher whose enormous concern for ethical matters is evident throughout his many writings, never published a book on ethics. Though he had promised at the conclusion of Being and Nothingness to write such a work, and worked tirelessly on the project in the late 1940s, he was unable to complete it to his satisfaction, and eventually abandoned it, unfinished. Some of the fruits of his labors were eventually published posthumously, however, in 1983 as Cahiers pour une morale (and in 1992 as Notebooks for an Ethics in David Pellauer's English translation). These Notebooks are thus immensely significant, since they represent Sartre's single most extensive discussion of ethics. But their scattered, fragmentary, and unorganized character presents many challenges to the reader. Gail Linsenbard's clear discussion and analysis (the only book length study of the Notebooks, to my knowledge) is therefore most welcome.
The Notebooks are also noteworthy because they complement and clarify Sartre's published writings of the period, especially Being and Nothingness. For example, Linsenbard reads the Notebooks, correctly in my view, as offering answers to the series of questions that Sartre had posed at the conclusion of Being and Nothingness:
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有