Climate change represents a "tragedy of the commons" on a global scale, requiring the cooperation of nations that do not necessarily put the Earth's well-being above their own national interests. And yet international efforts to address global warming have met with some success; the Kyoto Protocol, in which industrialized countries committed to reducing their collective emissions, took effect in 2005 (although without the participation of the United States). Reversing the lens used by previous scholarship on the topic, Global Commons, Domestic Decisions explains international action on climate change from the perspective of countries' domestic politics.
In an effort to understand both what progress has been made and why it has been so limited, experts in comparative politics look at the experience of seven jurisdictions in deciding whether or not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and to pursue national climate change mitigation policies. By analyzing the domestic politics and international positions of the United States, Australia, Russia, China, the European Union, Japan, and Canada, the authors demonstrate clearly that decisions about global policies are often made locally, in the context of electoral and political incentives, the normative commitments of policymakers, and domestic political institutions. Using a common analytical framework throughout, the book offers a unique comparison of the domestic political forces within each nation that affect climate change policy and provides insights into why some countries have been able to adopt innovative and aggressive positions on climate change both domestically and internationally.
"In the gloomy aftermath of the Copenhagen climate summit, there has been much talk of finding new ways to advance policy change at the national level. This skillfully edited and illuminating collection of national studies identifies the possibilities as well as the obstacles to pursuing policy change at this level of governance. I am certain it will meet the needs of students and scholars of international as well as comparative environmental politics and policy."
—Andrew J. Jordan, Professor, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia
"This book makes an important and distinctive contribution to the literature on comparative environmental policies and politics. It clearly and convincingly describes and explains the the policy approaches of the European Union, the United States, Russia, Japan, Canada, Australia, and China toward addressing the risks of global climate change. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in understanding the complex relationship between the domestic and international dimensions of climate change policies."
—David Vogel, Haas School of Business, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
Kathryn Harrison is Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of British Columbia.
Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of British Columbia.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部书的行文风格转换得非常大胆,尤其是在探讨法律和治理的章节,作者突然切换到一种近乎辩论赛的论证模式,充满了强烈的修辞色彩和批判性的诘问。这使得原本可能沉闷的法律条文分析焕发出一种激昂的生命力。他似乎在与那些固守传统主权至上论的学者进行一场跨越时空的对话,不断抛出尖锐的问题,迫使读者走出舒适区。我尤其欣赏他对于“模糊地带”的执着探索。他似乎对清晰的边界和明确的界限抱有一种天然的警惕,认为真正的挑战和创新的可能往往就潜藏在那些规则尚未完全覆盖的灰色地带。这种对不确定性的拥抱,反倒为解决全球性危机提供了一种更具弹性和适应性的思维框架。这绝不是一本老老实实的教科书,它更像是一场思想的搏击,充满了智慧的火花和思想的张力。
评分读完第三部分,我不得不停下来,反复琢磨作者是如何将看似毫不相干的国内政策细节,与全球范围内的环境治理难题串联起来的。这不仅仅是简单的因果链条展示,更像是一种精妙的结构主义解构,揭示了隐藏在国家主权叙事背后的权力运作逻辑。我印象最深的是他对地方性法规如何“溢出”并影响国际谈判的案例研究。那种层层递进的分析,犹如剥洋葱,一层层剥开决策的表象,直到触及最核心的利益驱动和意识形态偏见。作者的笔触冷静而犀利,毫不留情地指出,许多我们引以为傲的国内“进步”往往建立在对外部资源的隐形攫取之上,或者说,国内的稳定是以牺牲某个层面的“公域”为代价的。这种对内政外交双重标准的深刻反思,迫使读者重新审视自己所处的社会结构,那种不适感是阅读一本真正有价值的书所必需的阵痛。
评分这部新作,老实说,我刚翻开时心里是有些忐忑的。标题那种宏大叙事和微观治理之间的拉扯感,很容易让人联想到那些冗长、晦涩的学术论文,那些试图用一个包罗万象的理论框架去驯服现实世界复杂性的尝试。然而,作者出乎意料地在开篇就采取了一种非常接地气的叙事手法,仿佛带着读者走进了一场跨越地理和政治边界的田野调查。我特别欣赏他对“共享”这一概念的解构,它不是一个静止的乌托邦式愿景,而是一个动态的、充满摩擦和妥协的政治过程。书中对不同文化背景下资源分配机制的对比分析,尤其生动。比如,对某个太平洋岛国社区如何通过世代相传的非正式契约来管理渔业资源的描述,那种细腻的观察,让人真切感受到知识的重量,它不是从高高在上的理论殿堂里俯瞰下来的,而是浸润在当地人日常劳作和相互依存的肌理之中的。这种扎根于具体案例的论证,极大地增强了文本的说服力,让原本抽象的“公域”概念变得触手可及,充满了生活的质感和人性的温度。
评分从阅读体验上来说,这本书的节奏控制堪称一流。它在宏大叙事与微观叙事之间游刃有余地切换,使得读者的注意力始终被牢牢吸引。我特别喜欢其中穿插的那些历史回顾,它们不是简单的历史注脚,而是作为一种深刻的参照系,用来映照当下的困境。作者似乎在提醒我们,今天我们面对的每一个“公域”难题,几乎都可以在过去的某个时间点找到其思想的萌芽或失败的教训。这种对历史纵深的挖掘,为理解当前的政治僵局提供了必要的耐心和审慎。与其他探讨类似主题的著作相比,这本书的优势在于它避免了过度技术化,而是将复杂的理论嵌入到引人入胜的故事线中。读到最后,你不会觉得被一堆专业术语淹没,反而对人类社会在集体行动中的困境与潜力,有了一种更为谦卑和深刻的理解。
评分这本书的结论部分尤其发人深省,它没有给出任何一锤定音的“灵丹妙药”,这让我感到非常欣慰。许多社会科学著作在收尾时,总倾向于提供一个完美的、可操作的政策蓝图,结果往往是脱离实际的空谈。但这位作者的高明之处在于,他选择了一种更加负责任的态度——承认复杂性,并呼吁建立一种持续的、适应性的对话机制。他强调的“协商的艺术”远比任何既定的规则都更为重要。阅读到此处,我仿佛被拉回到最初的那个问题:我们如何共同生活在一个边界日益模糊的世界里?这本书没有提供一个终点,但它无疑为我们指明了一条艰难但充满希望的路径,一条需要不断学习、不断修正、充满地方智慧与全球视野交织的“协商之路”。这是一种成熟的学术表达,值得反复品味和深入践行。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有