About the Author
Dani Rodrik is the Rafiq Hariri Professor of International Political Economy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
homepage=
www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/drodrik/
blog=
rodrik.typepad.com/
Product Description
Surveying three centuries of economic history, a Harvard professor argues for a leaner global system that puts national democracies front and center. From the mercantile monopolies of seventeenth-century empires to the modern-day authority of the WTO, IMF, and World Bank, the nations of the world have struggled to effectively harness globalization's promise. The economic narratives that underpinned these eras—the gold standard, the Bretton Woods regime, the "Washington Consensus"—brought great success and great failure. In this eloquent challenge to the reigning wisdom on globalization, Dani Rodrik offers a new narrative, one that embraces an ineluctable tension: we cannot simultaneously pursue democracy, national self-determination, and economic globalization. When the social arrangements of democracies inevitably clash with the international demands of globalization, national priorities should take precedence. Combining history with insight, humor with good-natured critique, Rodrik's case for a customizable globalization supported by a light frame of international rules shows the way to a balanced prosperity as we confront today's global challenges in trade, finance, and labor markets.
看的时候,觉得此书号称“警世之作”也算当之无愧,后来想了想,到处看了看,又觉得还是加个问号比较好。 警了谁呢? 对老百姓来说,似乎从没真的完全在意过什么超级全球化、自由主义之类。 对政府,貌似当今大部分政府也不是真的就吃这一套,更多的是一些政治博弈,如书中所言...
评分 评分这是了解全球化现状的一本好书,有深度但又可以读下去。作者指出最好的全球化,是通过国际合作设计交通规则,让各个主权国家有充分的政策权;贸易只是手段,而非目的;像中国低估人民币和庞大的贸易顺差这些问题,源于世贸规则对国家主权政策限制,迫使主权国家为国内利益计而...
评分这是了解全球化现状的一本好书,有深度但又可以读下去。作者指出最好的全球化,是通过国际合作设计交通规则,让各个主权国家有充分的政策权;贸易只是手段,而非目的;像中国低估人民币和庞大的贸易顺差这些问题,源于世贸规则对国家主权政策限制,迫使主权国家为国内利益计而...
评分妈耶现在看这书就跟预言一样哦,黄金不可能三角是什么神仙理论????♀️
评分全球化三难困境的的论述精彩。对产业政策的评述不敢苟同。
评分I think Rodrik knows the book is but a bedtime story for grown-ups, especially toward the end.
评分Chp.9 2016 YU international economic development
评分The transformation from commercial capitalism to industrial capitalism happened 200 years ago. Why the recent fuss about trade?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有