Is economic development conducive to political democracy? Does democracy foster or hinder material welfare? These two questions are examined by looking at the experience of 135 countries between 1950 and 1990. Descriptive information, statistical analyses, and historical narratives are interwoven to gain an understanding of the dynamic of political regimes and their impact on economic development and other aspects of material welfare. The findings, several most surprising, dispel any notion of a trade-off between democracy and development. Economic development does not generate democracies but democracies are much more likely to survive in wealthy societies. Political regimes have no impact on the growth of total national incomes, while political instability affects growth only in dictatorships. Per capita incomes grow faster in democracies since population increases faster under dictatorships. In general, political regimes have more of an effect on demography than on economics.
评分
评分
评分
评分
其实一开始就这种量化太强行,不过倒是好多老师都喜欢用来做教材方便发散思维讨论吧。
评分其实一开始就这种量化太强行,不过倒是好多老师都喜欢用来做教材方便发散思维讨论吧。
评分The world will be better, much better.
评分在讨论民主制度和经济增长上的方法有待商榷,但关于不同政体在不同阶段有不同的经济增长模式的讨论倒是蛮有意思的。在经济起步阶段,民主国家和非民主国家直接因为绝对值所限区别不大,但到了增长后期,非民主国家更多依赖廉价劳动力实现发展,而民主国家则通过资本积累和劳力质量的提升发展。是个很好的实证题目
评分MIT的牛人的那篇反驳就冲这书去的
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有