Democracy and Development pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 政治学
- 比较政治
- 民主转型
- 政治经济学
- Przeworski
- 民主化理论
- 民主
- 经济学
Is economic development conducive to political democracy? Does democracy foster or hinder material welfare? These two questions are examined by looking at the experience of 135 countries between 1950 and 1990. Descriptive information, statistical analyses, and historical narratives are interwoven to gain an understanding of the dynamic of political regimes and their impact on economic development and other aspects of material welfare. The findings, several most surprising, dispel any notion of a trade-off between democracy and development. Economic development does not generate democracies but democracies are much more likely to survive in wealthy societies. Political regimes have no impact on the growth of total national incomes, while political instability affects growth only in dictatorships. Per capita incomes grow faster in democracies since population increases faster under dictatorships. In general, political regimes have more of an effect on demography than on economics.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Economic development is the key indicator of the SURVIVAL of democracy. Can't agree more.
评分我不喜欢量化研究
评分其实一开始就这种量化太强行，不过倒是好多老师都喜欢用来做教材方便发散思维讨论吧。
评分此书是政治学研究的经典之作了。另一方面，此书所引发的问题大概也远远比它解决的问题要来的多得多。就经验研究来验证民主政治和非民主政治对于经济发展的推动，迄今为止，仍旧依赖于若干较为暧昧的理论假设。倘若一个经济学家做类似的研究，在实证上得出了计划经济和市场经济国家在20-90年代不同的发展绩效，恐怕也绝不能得出，就理论本身而言，计划经济在资源的分配上某些方面更胜一筹的结论。之所以如此，就在于从纯粹的理论框架而言，实践中的计划经济和计划经济的理论模型所要求的那些条件有着非常巨大的差异。就此，一个人也可以说实践中的计划经济体正是由于积极偏离了计划经济理论的要求，才得到了经济增长的结论。在此书的研究设计也是如此。以最小限的民主理论试图得到最大限的经验观察，我个人是颇为持保守态度的。理论研究还需要推进
评分The world will be better, much better.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有