British economist ALFRED MARSHALL (1842-1924) was one of the most prominent thinkers of his age on the philosophy of finance, and this, considered his greatest work, was for years the standard text on the subject. First published in 1890, it serves as an excellent primer on such topics as: basic economic laws the purpose of economic studies fundamental concepts including wealth, production, consumption, labor, income, capital, and others understanding consumer demand an introduction to market studies and much more. This replica of the 1920 eighth edition is completely unabridged, and features the vital Mathematical Appendix, including all of Marshall's equations and diagrams.
具體描述
讀後感
全书七百多页，如此，越发感到经典的厚重。 依稀记得四年前刚刚涉略经济学领域的书籍，第一本看的是《国富论》，苦于专业知识的知之寥寥，经典读起来是那么的晦涩难懂，但即使是那样的环境下，因为对经典的仰慕与崇拜，我也硬是把通书都浏览了一遍（虽然所获甚少）。如...
評分首先对这本书一个评价，全面而不够透彻 首先，在我看来，马歇尔对于经济学的研究是建立在对人的欲望的探究上的。不同于马克思对劳动的详细阐述，该书对人的心理（无论是生产者还是消费者）都有着较为深入的探讨。其实从这个角度来理解经济学是一种创新，也是一种补充，因为人的...
評分我在豆瓣电子书上，试读了两个版本的《经济学原理》。一个是宇琦翻译的（https://read.douban.com/ebook/795208/），一个就是这本。 我发现章洞易译本在开头章节有几个缺点：1）较之宇琦的版本少了一些图表、注释（可能来自原文）；2）译文读取来比较以生硬，有些章节甚至难以...
評分我在豆瓣电子书上，试读了两个版本的《经济学原理》。一个是宇琦翻译的（https://read.douban.com/ebook/795208/），一个就是这本。 我发现章洞易译本在开头章节有几个缺点：1）较之宇琦的版本少了一些图表、注释（可能来自原文）；2）译文读取来比较以生硬，有些章节甚至难以...
評分全书七百多页，如此，越发感到经典的厚重。 依稀记得四年前刚刚涉略经济学领域的书籍，第一本看的是《国富论》，苦于专业知识的知之寥寥，经典读起来是那么的晦涩难懂，但即使是那样的环境下，因为对经典的仰慕与崇拜，我也硬是把通书都浏览了一遍（虽然所获甚少）。如...
用戶評價
People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有