British economist ALFRED MARSHALL (1842-1924) was one of the most prominent thinkers of his age on the philosophy of finance, and this, considered his greatest work, was for years the standard text on the subject. First published in 1890, it serves as an excellent primer on such topics as: basic economic laws the purpose of economic studies fundamental concepts including wealth, production, consumption, labor, income, capital, and others understanding consumer demand an introduction to market studies and much more. This replica of the 1920 eighth edition is completely unabridged, and features the vital Mathematical Appendix, including all of Marshall's equations and diagrams.
具体描述
读后感
虽然是本名著，谈的是跟我们生活息息相关的经济学，但却以易懂、浅显的方式表达，全面的描述了经济学基础理论体系！ 1、资本与老工工资这块看的我是后背发麻，尤其处于低层劳工，是如何受着有限的工资所得以及可替代性较强的竞争，还有身心健康的隐患，来逐步的改变了自己的性...
评分想了解下经济学，是因为想创业，在书店买了这本书，因为序上面说本书适合经济学入门的人群读。。。入门？看看就知道了，不论语法，专业名词，等。。。。都太深了，太难读了，还说什么是入门学者读的，听说曼昆版的经济学原理很好，最近打算重新买一本
评分看的简装本。 句子就不舒服，大大地减弱了我的阅读速度。 马歇尔的体例安排也不好。 这个人似乎是个死板的研究人员。在斯密挥洒的国富论之后，经济学变成一种在追随科学性的学科，马歇尔自己都明白在当时，经济学是非常低等的科学，基本上不能说是科学。前几章就经济学的情况以...
评分亚当斯密的《国富论》是经济学发轫的开山之著，之前他写的《道德情操论》同样伟大。探究逐利的人性基本冲动的同时，寄希望于人类对公正和道德的不懈追求。所以受经典马克思主义理论教化成长起来的我们，在初看到亚当斯密左手是资本，右手是道德时，颇狐疑。 一路上左右顾盼纷...
评分我在豆瓣电子书上，试读了两个版本的《经济学原理》。一个是宇琦翻译的（https://read.douban.com/ebook/795208/），一个就是这本。 我发现章洞易译本在开头章节有几个缺点：1）较之宇琦的版本少了一些图表、注释（可能来自原文）；2）译文读取来比较以生硬，有些章节甚至难以...
用户评价
People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
评分People say this book aggregates Economics. But actually it doesn't. The main idea is only marginal analysis repeating many times. This book lacked rigor of mathematical deduction and on the other hand, lacked cogent illustration as in Wealth of Nations. Still a great book to read.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有