Autopsia: Self, Death, and God After Kierkegaard and Derrida

Autopsia: Self, Death, and God After Kierkegaard and Derrida pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:
作者:Mjaaland, Marius Timmann
出品人:
页数:357
译者:Brian McNeil
出版时间:2008-2-27
价格:USD 160.00
装帧:
isbn号码:9783110191288
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 哲学
  • 存在主义
  • 死亡
  • 宗教
  • 解构主义
  • 克尔凯郭尔
  • 德里达
  • 自我
  • 神学
  • 后现代主义
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Kierkegaard and Derrida are two of the most influential thinkers of late modernity. Without reducing the difference between philosophy and religion, they both analyze the fundamental questions of human existence: How a human being relates to itself, to death, and to God. In Autopsia, the Norwegian scholar Marius Timmann Mjaaland has analyzed texts by Kierkegaard and Derrida, focusing on their rationality as well as ontheir content. The result is a far-reaching analysis of how philosophy may approach religious topics without reducing their inherent logos to the supposed universality of human reason.

《亡灵絮语:现代性、技术与存在的悖论》 一部对现代精神困境的深刻剖析 导言:在后现代的废墟之上重建意义的尝试 在二十一世纪的第三个十年,人类社会正以前所未有的速度被技术理性所重塑。我们生活在一个信息泛滥、自我概念日益碎片化的时代。传统上支撑西方文明的宏大叙事——无论是启蒙理性还是神学信仰——都已显得苍白无力,无法为个体提供稳固的道德锚点或存在意义的慰藉。 《亡灵絮语:现代性、技术与存在的悖论》并非是对既有哲学体系的简单回顾,而是一次深入现代精神迷宫的探险。本书聚焦于技术进步如何侵蚀我们对“真实”的感知,以及个体如何在被算法和数据流驱动的世界中,努力维系其独特性和道德能动性。 本书的核心论点在于:当代技术并非仅仅是工具的延伸,它已经内化为我们体验世界和构建自我的基本结构。这种结构带来的,是一种“透明的异化”——我们的生活被前所未有地暴露和记录,但我们却感觉更难把握自我的本质。 --- 第一部分:屏幕的幻象:技术对“在场”的消解 本部分深入探讨了数字媒介如何重构我们的“在场性”(Presence)概念。我们不再是被时间线性约束的实体,而是被分散于无数屏幕和云端数据的集合体。 第一章:代码即景观:技术视野下的实在 作者考察了“物联网”和“大数据”的哲学意涵。当一切事物都可被测量、编码和预测时,什么是不可量化的“自由意志”或“灵性体验”?本章通过对现象学中“身体性”概念的重新解读,论证了数字界面如何制造了一种脱离物理摩擦、却又看似无处不在的“超身体性”。我们通过屏幕感知世界,屏幕也反过来定义了我们所能感知的边界。这里的“真实”正在被编译成可操作的数据包。 第二章:即时性的暴政与历史的断裂 现代生活被“即时反馈”的需求所主宰。社交媒体的即时性创造了一种永恒的“现在”,它挤压了反思所需的时间深度,也使得历史的严肃性被简化为可供消费的梗图(meme)。本书探讨了这种“即时性暴政”如何阻碍了真正的伦理判断,因为伦理要求我们对未来的后果进行审慎的预见,而这恰恰是即时反馈机制所不鼓励的。 第三章:数字幽灵:身份的冗余与消失 当我们同时存在于多个在线平台时,哪个“我”才是真正的自我?本章分析了数字身份的冗余性——我们留下了海量的、彼此矛盾的数字足迹。这种碎片化使得“自我”变成了一个需要不断维护和修补的叙事工程。更进一步,当人工智能开始模仿人类情感和创造力时,人类经验的独特性受到了根本性的挑战。我们开始怀疑,驱动我们行为的究竟是自由意志,还是算法的优化路径。 --- 第二部分:意义的贫困:后人类境遇下的道德真空 技术进步并未带来预期的解放,反而揭示了一个更深层的道德和意义真空。本部分将目光转向技术理性在伦理领域造成的“失语症”。 第四章:效率的偶像崇拜:工具理性对目的的吞噬 从福柯对权力机制的批判出发,本书考察了现代机构如何将“效率”提升为至高无上的价值标准。在算法优化的驱动下,所有人类活动——教育、医疗、政治参与——都面临着被简化为投入产出比的风险。这种对效率的盲目追求,本质上是一种对意义的逃避,因为它要求我们停止追问“为什么”(Why),而只关注“如何”(How)。 第五章:同理心的计算与情感的量化 当代技术试图通过“情绪识别”软件和个性化推荐系统来“管理”人类情感。本书质疑了这种将情感还原为可测量数据的做法。同理心,作为一种基于不确定性和相互承认的复杂互动,是否能被还原为一组数据点?作者认为,对情感的量化尝试,不仅未能增进人际理解,反而可能导致一种“计算出的疏离”,即我们开始用算法模型来替代真正痛苦的、面对面的伦理责任。 第六章:无主之地:主体性危机后的责任重构 在传统神学和形而上学框架崩溃之后,责任的主体是谁?本书转向探讨在新技术环境下,我们如何重建责任感。这不仅是关于谁该为自动驾驶汽车的事故负责,更深层的是:面对全球性危机(如气候变化或信息战),个体如何定位自己的行动空间?作者提出了一种“分布式责任”的概念,强调个体在面对巨型技术系统时,必须重新定义其能动性(Agency)的范围。 --- 第三部分:亡灵絮语:在遗忘与铭记之间 本书的最后一部分,试图从技术对死亡和记忆的处理中,寻找重塑“人道”的可能性。 第七章:永生的诱惑与肉体的终结 数字永生(Digital Immortality)的设想,即上传意识或建立逝者的AI模型,是对人类终结性(Finitude)的终极反抗。然而,作者主张,正是我们的有限性赋予了经验以重量和紧迫感。对死亡的逃避,实质上是对生命意义的稀释。本章对“上传者”的哲学地位进行了严峻的拷问:一个没有腐烂、没有脆弱性的“自我”,是否还值得我们称之为“人”? 第八章:废墟中的考古学:数字遗迹与遗忘的政治 信息时代最大的悖论之一是“永久的记录”与“即时的遗忘”并存。一方面,我们的数据被无限期保存;另一方面,注意力经济使得任何信息都迅速被新的浪潮淹没。本书探讨了“遗忘的权利”在信息过载时代的必要性,以及如何从那些被技术系统忽略或抹除的“非结构化数据”中,挖掘出被压抑的、真正的人类经验的片段。 第九章:重申噪音:对抗纯净的系统 终结部分,本书呼吁回归“噪音”与“缺陷”。技术系统追求的是纯净、可预测和无摩擦的运作,但人类的创造力、爱和道德抉择恰恰发生在我们体验的“噪音”和“摩擦”之中。真正的反抗并非是推翻技术,而是学习如何在技术构建的系统内部,保持一种“不合时宜的坚持”——对非效率、对非量化、对无法被优化的事物(如沉默、冥想、不合逻辑的爱)的坚持。 --- 结语:在空无的边缘,重获声音 《亡灵絮语》最终将读者引向一个悖论的交汇点:我们被技术包裹得越严密,就越需要重新聆听那些看似遥远、被我们抛弃的声音——身体的低语、历史的回响、以及那些在算法之外徘徊的“亡灵”。本书旨在提供一种审慎的批判框架,帮助读者在技术构建的透明世界中,找到维护其复杂性、脆弱性和内在神圣性的空间。 本书适合哲学、社会学、媒体理论、技术伦理学以及所有对现代生存状态感到不安的读者。它不是提供答案,而是提供一套更锐利的工具,去审视我们正在建造的这个未来。

作者简介

His primary interest is in philosophy and theology. But his interdisciplinary orientation has already led him to new and innovative fields of research. This fall, Mjaaland returned to his Alma Mater.

Marius T. Mjaaland is originally a philosopher who studied in Oslo, Göttingen, Heidelberg, and Copenhagen. He has worked extensively on Plato and Kant, Hegel and Søren Kierkegaard - the Danish philosopher who argued that "death is a mighty thinker who is able not only to think through every illusion but can break it down to pieces, think it unto nothing."

“There is such existential intensity in Kierkegaard's philosophy, which has influenced a number of philosophers and authors in the 20th and 21st century, such as Heidegger, Arendt, Ricoeur, and Derrida. And me too, I have to add”, Mjaaland tells us. He says that Derrida's philosophy plays a key role in his analysis of Hegel and Kierkegaard in his book Autopsia(2008).After finishing his PhD, he worked as a postdoctoral fellow in Tübingen, Oslo, and Chicago, and later as Humboldt scholar in Hamburg and Rostock. After one year in Halden (HiØ), he was appointed professor at the University of Oslo and academic director of the inter facultary research area Religion in Pluralist Societies (PluRel)Interdisciplinary interest

“I am attracted by the interdisciplinary approach to religion and theology at the University of Oslo, hence I was happy and honored to be offered the Chair for Philosophy of Religion, a position which invites further co-operation and research in this field”, Mjaaland says.

His interdisciplinary interest is clearly visible in his publications as well. Since he has studied the history of religions, history of ideas and theology, he has become increasingly interested in questions of Christian doctrine, political theology, and the notion of the hidden God (Luther). His book on Luther is simply called The Hidden God (2016).

“The original idea of this book is to read Luther as a thinker of scripture and writing, and hence also of deconstruction. It is also a critical analysis of the metaphysical foundation of politics and violence in Luther's theology”, Mjaaland explains.

“Another question that has occupied me for years is the foundation and current relevance of Christian doctrine. In Systematic Theology (Systematisk teologi, 2017) I give a contemporary interpretation of key topics in Christian thought and faith, often with reference to philosophical or literary texts, and with numerous references to the Bible, of course.” The Big Questions of Life

His interest in this field of research started at the age of 16, when his father had a serious brainstroke.

“I began reading philosophy and literature about questions of life and death, meaning, deception and truth” he tells us, and continues: “This interest was deepened by his death a few years later and I extended my reading to various religious texts, in particular the Bible, theology and philosophy.”

“Actually, since then I have never thought it was boring. You can continue delving deeper into the big questions of life as long as you keep on reading good texts - and leave the bad ones in your bookshelf”, he says.

First love, and a new love?

We asked Mjaaland why he wanted to come to the Faculty of Theology in Oslo.

“Could it be what they call, hum, a 'first love'?”, he asks with a smile.

“I started studying at this university in 1990 and I have always returned to Oslo. I have enjoyed visiting other universities, and I will encourage all our students to do so, but this is definitely a great place to study philosophy and theology.”

So, what about the future? What will be the primary focus of his research?

“Some of the questions I have dealt with will keep on haunting me, like the question of the hidden God, life and death, and the mysteries and challenges of Christian life and thought.”

“But for the moment I have also found a new field of interest: The Life Sciences and the co-operation between neurobiology, medicine, and phenomenology. I will continue studying life under the headline of neurophenomenology, as I suggested in my inauguration lecture: Life and Death. Time and Space”, Mjaaland concludes.

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有