Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 哲学
- Kant
- 英文
- textbook
- pomona
- philosophy
- Philosophy
- 伦理学
- 道德哲学
- 康德
- 形而上学
- 理性主义
- 义务论
- 道德原则
- 自由意志
- 普遍法则
- 价值理论
具体描述
Considered one of the most profound, influential, and important works of philosophy, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals introduces the famous Categorical Imperative and lays down a foundation for all of Immanuel Kant's writings. In it, Kant illuminates the basic concept that is central to his moral philosophy and, in fact, to the entire field of modern ethical thought: the Categorical Imperative, the supreme principle of morality, stating that all decisions should be made based on what is universally acceptable. Featuring the renowned translation and commentary of Oxford's H. J. Paton, this volume has long been considered the definitive English edition of Kant's classic text. "Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals ," Paton writes in his preface, "is one of the small books which is truly great: it has exercised on human thought an influence almost ludicrously disproportionate to its size."
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
一 18个月前我不知道是第几次读了康德的这篇文章，写了一篇评论。今天再看，熟悉的感觉又来了：回望过去的自己，感觉是一个笨蛋。这种感觉，常常让我很沮丧。 有时候又很压抑。这种压抑的感觉，出现在我每次设想人类可能的遥远未来的时候；出现在我尝试参透一些就如Aristotle的...
评分 评分Kant的generalization method to obtain moral law Kant为了说明moral law来自于理性，所以就列出一个general formula,说人就是从这种方式得到的categorical imperative： 第一步：把你做这件事的所想达到的目的列出来（maxim） 第二步：想象一个世界所有人都为了达到这个目的...
评分【摘要】康德的目的王国是一个伦理的共同体而非政治的共同体，Katrin Flikschuh认为Christine M.Korsgaard等学者从共同立法和交互强制的角度将目的王国理念解读成了一种规范性的政治共同体。KatrinFlikschuh的核心观点在于目的王国是个体的有限理性存在者造就的,不是个体之间相...
用户评价
Humenas and kantians disagree about the nature of practical reason:whether reason cna be practical or whether reson can only be"slave"of the passions.All of this seems to have signnificant implications for questions about the ultimate basis of morality.But what implications, if any,does it have for debates about what we might call the content of M
评分Humenas and kantians disagree about the nature of practical reason:whether reason cna be practical or whether reson can only be"slave"of the passions.All of this seems to have signnificant implications for questions about the ultimate basis of morality.But what implications, if any,does it have for debates about what we might call the content of M
评分never fall behind on readings TAT
评分Humenas and kantians disagree about the nature of practical reason:whether reason cna be practical or whether reson can only be"slave"of the passions.All of this seems to have signnificant implications for questions about the ultimate basis of morality.But what implications, if any,does it have for debates about what we might call the content of M
评分never fall behind on readings TAT
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有