Japan has done marvelous things with cinema, giving the world the likes of Kurosawa, Mizoguchi, and Ozu. But cinema did not arrive in Japan fully formed at the end of the nineteenth century, nor was it simply adopted into an ages-old culture. Aaron Gerow explores the processes by which film was defined, transformed, and adapted during its first three decades in Japan. He focuses in particular on how one trend in criticism, the 'Pure Film Movement', changed not only the way films were made, but also how they were conceived. Looking closely at the work of critics, theorists, intellectuals, benshi artists, educators, police, and censors, Gerow finds that this trend established a way of thinking about cinema that would reign in Japan for much of the twentieth century.
评分
评分
评分
评分
早期日本电影史中最喜欢的一本,写得好,观点好,资料丰富,方法论上也有贡献。
评分well-written preface concerning the general evaluation of early Japanese film as well as its relevant studies. Using discursive study as the method, the author arguably put that the cinema is not a preexisting subject, but rather a concept born and shaped within divers discours.
评分well-written preface concerning the general evaluation of early Japanese film as well as its relevant studies. Using discursive study as the method, the author arguably put that the cinema is not a preexisting subject, but rather a concept born and shaped within divers discours.
评分日本版《銀幕豔史》@@
评分well-written preface concerning the general evaluation of early Japanese film as well as its relevant studies. Using discursive study as the method, the author arguably put that the cinema is not a preexisting subject, but rather a concept born and shaped within divers discours.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有