史蒂芬·列維特,1994年在麻省理工大學取得經濟學博士學位。1997年進入芝加哥大學執教短短兩年時間列維特就成為芝加哥大學經濟學院終身教授。2002年列維特被選為美國科學院經濟學部委員。列維特還擔任《政治經濟學雜誌》(JPE)的編輯和《經濟學季刊》(OJE)的編輯。
史蒂芬·都伯納,《紐約時報》和《紐約客》長期撰稿人,著有暢銷書《騷動的靈魂》和《一個英雄崇拜者的自白》。
In the summer of 2003, the New York Times Magazine sent Stephen J. Dubner, an author and journalist, to write a profile of Steven D. Levitt, a heralded young economist at the University of Chicago. Levitt was not remotely interested in the things that interest most economists. More...
Instead, he studied the riddles of everyday lifefrom cheating to crime to child-rearingand his conclusions turned the conventional wisdom on its head. For instance, he argued that one of the main causes of the crime drop of the 1990s was the legalization of abortion twenty years earlier. (Unwanted children have a greater likelihood of becoming criminals; with so many unwanted children being aborted in the 1970s, the pool of potential criminals had significantly shrunk by the 1990s.) The Times article yielded an unprecedented response, a deluge of interest from thousands of curious, inspired, and occasionally distraught readers. Levitt and Dubner collaborated on a book that gives full play to Levitts most compelling ideas. Through forceful storytelling and pungent insight. FREAKONOMICS reminds us all that economics is, at root, the study of incentiveshow people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing. Among the questions it answers: Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? If drug dealers make so much money, why do they still live with their mothers? What makes a perfect parent? And, of course: What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? (Answer: they both cheat.)
这本书曾经高居Amazon排行榜,而且,他从英文翻译成中文,也是速度比较快的。我在豆瓣的第一个好友Windrose早早就为此书写过一篇书评,感兴趣的可以去参考。 既然已经不是时髦阅读物,现在来补写书评,我就勉为其难的语出惊人一回。 很多推介这本书的人,都介绍到作者讲了6...
評分我是一个经济学盲。 因为我是一个经济学盲,所以对于这本号称能够“敲破你脑袋”的书产生了兴趣。不夸张的说,这是我读的第一本和经济沾边的书,可是它并没有像承诺的那样,敲破我的脑袋,或者“彻底改变”我“看世界的角度”。事实上,我根本没觉得自己看世界的方式因为这本...
評分很多经典的经济学的前提假设,都把人看成是完全理性,然后依据此假设,建立许多的数学模型。 当然经过长期的数据积累是可以看出未来趋势,但是所有的经济现象都是依据人的行为来完成,而人所完成的行为总是依据个人的动机来进行自己的行动。 博弈论是经济学界正式把人的微观动...
評分 評分淺顯的語言, 很耐看
评分My friends told me that there are lots of dataset included in this book. Controversial but fun.
评分"Morality, it could be argued, represents the way that people would like the world to work — whereas economics represents how it actually does work."
评分看瞭,英文版。的確通俗,的確有趣。不過實在是太不靠譜,請問每一個chapter的主題是什麼?隨便抓兩個東西就開始扯。。的確是一種新穎的思維方式,可是關經濟什麼事?還是我對這本書期望值太高瞭?
评分"Morality, it could be argued, represents the way that people would like the world to work — whereas economics represents how it actually does work."
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有