Our understanding of what makes a person a relative has been transformed by radical changes in marriage arrangements and gender relations, and by new reproductive technologies. We can no longer take it for granted that our most fundamental social relationships are grounded in 'biology' or 'nature'. These developments have prompted anthropologists to take a fresh look at idioms of relatedness in other societies, and to review the ways in which relationships are symbolised and interpreted in our own society. Defamiliarizing some classic cases, challenging the established analytic categories of anthropology, the contributors to this innovative book focus on the boundary between the 'biological' and the 'social', and bring into question the received wisdom at the heart of the study of kinship.
评分
评分
评分
评分
当时觉得这本书提出来的简直是当代kinship研究的一个朴素又着重点的观点,去念了乡土中国之后又觉得有些熟悉?something is out there
评分尝试用relatedness这个角度,开放性更强。fluid nature of Chinese kinship
评分当时觉得这本书提出来的简直是当代kinship研究的一个朴素又着重点的观点,去念了乡土中国之后又觉得有些熟悉?something is out there
评分introduction, schneider, biological/social relatedness; Chinese case, challenge Chinese patriliny (lineage paradigm by Freedman) in kinship with emphasis on 养 and 来往 (social construction rather than biological connection)and some woman in 养 and nuclear family analysis to demonstrate the relatedness
评分当时觉得这本书提出来的简直是当代kinship研究的一个朴素又着重点的观点,去念了乡土中国之后又觉得有些熟悉?something is out there
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有