For two thousand years the disparate groups that now reside in Zomia (a mountainous region the size of Europe that consists of portions of seven Asian countries) have fled the projects of the organized state societies that surround them?slavery, conscription, taxes, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare. This book, essentially an ?anarchist history,? is the first-ever examination of the huge literature on state-making whose author evaluates why people would deliberately and reactively remain stateless. Among the strategies employed by the people of Zomia to remain stateless are physical dispersion in rugged terrain; agricultural practices that enhance mobility; pliable ethnic identities; devotion to prophetic, millenarian leaders; and maintenance of a largely oral culture that allows them to reinvent their histories and genealogies as they move between and around states.
In accessible language, James Scott, recognized worldwide as an eminent authority in Southeast Asian, peasant, and agrarian studies, tells the story of the peoples of Zomia and their unlikely odyssey in search of self-determination. He redefines our views on Asian politics, history, demographics, and even our fundamental ideas about what constitutes civilization, and challenges us with a radically different approach to history that presents events from the perspective of stateless peoples and redefines state-making as a form of ?internal colonialism.? This new perspective requires a radical reevaluation of the civilizational narratives of the lowland states. Scott?s work on Zomia represents a new way to think of area studies that will be applicable to other runaway, fugitive, and marooned communities, be they Gypsies, Cossacks, tribes fleeing slave raiders, Marsh Arabs, or San-Bushmen.
James C. Scott is Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Programme, Yale University, and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
解构极端现代主义:从前现代国家发展中寻求启发:以人民的名义来反对个人,以程式化、扭曲化、精确静止的理念实现独裁统治。而这些理念背后反映出的统治者试图以极具说服力的现代工具和社会欲望为诱饵,强加于人民权威意识形态的行为,其实在无政府主义的抗争中就已经被解构了...
評分上个学期社会学课上的老教授超喜欢韦伯。他喜欢韦伯在新教伦理里的想法,他说他希望有人证明能它,因为他喜欢这个理论。但是他也说,最近的社会学,大家都在问“你怎么证明这个”之类的问题,却没有人写出比韦伯涂尔干更深刻的思想。 教授说这话之前我读了斯科特的《国家的视...
評分(《云南社会科学》2019年第三期) | 王晓毅 如果将社会发展看做一个简单的线性发展过程,山地社会往往被看做是落后的,并被认为会在先进文明的影响下,逐步发展起来。但是斯科特在《逃避统治的艺术》一书中,构建了与这种想象不同的山地文明,山地为山地居民提供了保护,从而...
評分作者探究的对象是包括中国西南在内的所谓赞米亚高地,读来很亲切,也很有启迪性。书中涉及到了史学(政治史、边疆史、民族史、经济史)、人类学、社会学等多个方面,内容十分丰富。这书的翻译真心不错,读起来轻松,不别扭。我同时也购过作者所著的上海译林版的《农民的道义经...
評分处在伊河上的陆浑水库,位于洛阳嵩县,是上世纪六十年代修建的。在夏商时期,生活在这里的是一批被称为西戎的人,而“戎”是古代对少数民族的称呼。不敢想象位于中原地区洛阳的下属县曾是汉人文化边缘地带。那时中华文明的版图很小,夏商的历史简直可以称为河南的历史。史书说...
參考Edmund Leach對緬甸高地的類型學分析
评分非常喜歡這種無政府主義的態度,喜歡這種人類學理路的底層視角。寫作風格不算好,囉裏囉嗦很難讀,用詞也很奇葩。
评分zomia,我們其實叫它為“金三角”。作為問題域,它顛覆瞭民族國傢分析框架。scott關心的那些人,他們不斷逃離國傢宰製,成為瞭這世界上獨特的一群。那麼多人研究中國西南的少數民族,若是像scott這樣來研究,還真是有意思。
评分在推薦單裏很久纔看。作者在自己的序中坦白自己經常一派鬍言。當然我之前寫瞭西方論述要求邏輯清晰錶達一個觀點,基本事實對錯次要,按這個標準這是一本新穎好書。用書中觀點,地形決定無政府狀態,高地交通限製政府通知,人民選擇逃離政府,套用到我國現在的帶路工程上的話,難怪西方辯論不斷重提意識形態鬥爭,我覺得老掉牙又不是冷戰,然而從他們的觀點,我們修通瞭去世界各國的路就把我們的製度和影響帶過去瞭嘛。又想到國內其實仍然有很多不理會現代國傢政治的部族比如比較齣名的濾沽湖,這些地方能挺多久?
评分參考Edmund Leach對緬甸高地的類型學分析
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有