For two thousand years the disparate groups that now reside in Zomia (a mountainous region the size of Europe that consists of portions of seven Asian countries) have fled the projects of the organized state societies that surround them?slavery, conscription, taxes, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare. This book, essentially an ?anarchist history,? is the first-ever examination of the huge literature on state-making whose author evaluates why people would deliberately and reactively remain stateless. Among the strategies employed by the people of Zomia to remain stateless are physical dispersion in rugged terrain; agricultural practices that enhance mobility; pliable ethnic identities; devotion to prophetic, millenarian leaders; and maintenance of a largely oral culture that allows them to reinvent their histories and genealogies as they move between and around states.
In accessible language, James Scott, recognized worldwide as an eminent authority in Southeast Asian, peasant, and agrarian studies, tells the story of the peoples of Zomia and their unlikely odyssey in search of self-determination. He redefines our views on Asian politics, history, demographics, and even our fundamental ideas about what constitutes civilization, and challenges us with a radically different approach to history that presents events from the perspective of stateless peoples and redefines state-making as a form of ?internal colonialism.? This new perspective requires a radical reevaluation of the civilizational narratives of the lowland states. Scott?s work on Zomia represents a new way to think of area studies that will be applicable to other runaway, fugitive, and marooned communities, be they Gypsies, Cossacks, tribes fleeing slave raiders, Marsh Arabs, or San-Bushmen.
James C. Scott is Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Programme, Yale University, and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
作者探究的对象是包括中国西南在内的所谓赞米亚高地,读来很亲切,也很有启迪性。书中涉及到了史学(政治史、边疆史、民族史、经济史)、人类学、社会学等多个方面,内容十分丰富。这书的翻译真心不错,读起来轻松,不别扭。我同时也购过作者所著的上海译林版的《农民的道义经...
评分 评分(《云南社会科学》2019年第三期) 一 引言 布罗代尔曾批评道:“长期以来,历史学家总是对平原流连忘返,而不愿意进入附近的高山。”[1]与历史学境况不同,山地是人类学家时常光顾的田野。晚年费孝通行行重行行,武夷山、南岭、凉山、武陵山等南方山区都留下了他的足迹。他将...
评分英文语句个人觉得写得有点艰涩和绕口,看着有点困难。
评分英文语句个人觉得写得有点艰涩和绕口,看着有点困难。
评分逃离国家——逃离的是臣民的身份,而不是与国家的关系。实际上,山民一直在寻找与国家的适当关系,才能让自己生存下来。
评分非常喜欢这种无政府主义的态度,喜欢这种人类学理路的底层视角。写作风格不算好,啰里啰嗦很难读,用词也很奇葩。
评分斯氏在数本书中似有种一以贯之的研究认识进路:强调人类学式实地田野、民族志、文本解读和质性认识;展现国家/官僚技术统治/市场经济覆盖地域以外社会形制自我维持和反抗简化统治形态扩展的可能性;以东南亚等边缘落后地区材料观照西欧中心为起始之现代世界;推出现代史和社科的学术书写中国家/现代性中心以外可能的历史书写方式。拒斥国家推展统治术并非罕见,但斯氏强调此种现象在东南亚以族群层次,利用地形、历史叙述和游耕模式战略性展开,逐渐形成一长期游离于各国边缘、仅在最低程度上利用国家资源的山民历史社会实体,故而反思欧美经验中国家扩展的天然性和统治术的建构与权力性,启发未来人类社会形态。对民族建构采强建构学说。反照主流社科,有趣问题便是为何现代民族国家在西欧展开如此顺利至被奉为理所当然,是战争的地理扩展使然?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有