James C. Scott is Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Programme, Yale University, and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
For two thousand years the disparate groups that now reside in Zomia (a mountainous region the size of Europe that consists of portions of seven Asian countries) have fled the projects of the organized state societies that surround them?slavery, conscription, taxes, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare. This book, essentially an ?anarchist history,? is the first-ever examination of the huge literature on state-making whose author evaluates why people would deliberately and reactively remain stateless. Among the strategies employed by the people of Zomia to remain stateless are physical dispersion in rugged terrain; agricultural practices that enhance mobility; pliable ethnic identities; devotion to prophetic, millenarian leaders; and maintenance of a largely oral culture that allows them to reinvent their histories and genealogies as they move between and around states.
In accessible language, James Scott, recognized worldwide as an eminent authority in Southeast Asian, peasant, and agrarian studies, tells the story of the peoples of Zomia and their unlikely odyssey in search of self-determination. He redefines our views on Asian politics, history, demographics, and even our fundamental ideas about what constitutes civilization, and challenges us with a radically different approach to history that presents events from the perspective of stateless peoples and redefines state-making as a form of ?internal colonialism.? This new perspective requires a radical reevaluation of the civilizational narratives of the lowland states. Scott?s work on Zomia represents a new way to think of area studies that will be applicable to other runaway, fugitive, and marooned communities, be they Gypsies, Cossacks, tribes fleeing slave raiders, Marsh Arabs, or San-Bushmen.
中国有句老话,“穷山恶水出刁民”,仔细想,可见其居心之险恶,这句话无外是站在所谓的“文明中心”看那些僻壤之境人群的生存方式,并在掌握了话语权的情况下随手贴上标签,维护自身秩序井然的形象。 但Scott 这本The Art of Not Being Governed 说的很清楚,首先,山地居民的...
评分非本人原创。庄雅仲副教授原文发表于《台湾民zhu季刊》第7卷第1期(2010年3月),175-178页。 庄雅仲个人网页:http://hs.nctu.edu.tw/Hakka-F-faculty/Faculty_07_YCChuang.htm 书评原文:http://www.tfd.org.tw/docs/d7t1/175-178.pdf —————————————————...
评分自国家诞生以来的文明历史上,国家和建立国家的民族一直是历史书写的主体和基本单位。国家、文明、历史,三者搅和在了一起。而这种文明史的一个组成部分就是,“有历史的人群”为“没有历史的人群”书写历史,并且最初当然是作为统治权延伸的附属记录来编制。与之相对,以种种...
评分 评分引 言 宣统三年(1911)夏天,川滇边务大臣赵尔丰在四川康区的“改土归流”事业进入尾声。康区改土归流的目标是把原土司地区从四川省划分出来,单独设立西康省,原土司管理下的各地方将改设为八九十个州县,由外派流官治理。[1]赵尔丰与助手傅嵩炑抵达康定(打箭炉),收缴完...
the history of people without history is a history of their struggle against the state
评分mind-blowing but too 啰嗦
评分斯氏在数本书中似有种一以贯之的研究认识进路:强调人类学式实地田野、民族志、文本解读和质性认识;展现国家/官僚技术统治/市场经济覆盖地域以外社会形制自我维持和反抗简化统治形态扩展的可能性;以东南亚等边缘落后地区材料观照西欧中心为起始之现代世界;推出现代史和社科的学术书写中国家/现代性中心以外可能的历史书写方式。拒斥国家推展统治术并非罕见,但斯氏强调此种现象在东南亚以族群层次,利用地形、历史叙述和游耕模式战略性展开,逐渐形成一长期游离于各国边缘、仅在最低程度上利用国家资源的山民历史社会实体,故而反思欧美经验中国家扩展的天然性和统治术的建构与权力性,启发未来人类社会形态。对民族建构采强建构学说。反照主流社科,有趣问题便是为何现代民族国家在西欧展开如此顺利至被奉为理所当然,是战争的地理扩展使然?
评分the history of people without history is a history of their struggle against the state
评分在推荐单里很久才看。作者在自己的序中坦白自己经常一派胡言。当然我之前写了西方论述要求逻辑清晰表达一个观点,基本事实对错次要,按这个标准这是一本新颖好书。用书中观点,地形决定无政府状态,高地交通限制政府通知,人民选择逃离政府,套用到我国现在的带路工程上的话,难怪西方辩论不断重提意识形态斗争,我觉得老掉牙又不是冷战,然而从他们的观点,我们修通了去世界各国的路就把我们的制度和影响带过去了嘛。又想到国内其实仍然有很多不理会现代国家政治的部族比如比较出名的泸沽湖,这些地方能挺多久?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有