Amazon.com Review
History has always been a problematic issue in India, where the dating of many a figure is accurate to only within centuries. So to attempt a definitive history of Hinduism would seem foolhardy. Klaus Klostermaier approximated the impossible in his 715-page Survey of Hinduism, and now he has boiled it all down to about half that size. Hinduism is defined as that family of religions that accept the Vedas as authoritative, but despite the single moniker the differences can be vast. From fertility cults to precise rituals that date back thousands of years, Klostermaier cuts across time to illustrate the major strains of Hindu tradition--Vaisnavism, Saivism, and Saktism, along with the nonsectarian smarta. He includes a short history of Hindu philosophy, which in India is inseparable from religion. Klostermaier is a first-rate scholar who expects a lot from his readers, sometimes too much. Anyone who isn't somewhat versed in Hinduism already would do well to pick up his Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism for handy reference. --Brian Bruya
From Library Journal
Oneworld has become one of the most successful publishers of books on world religions, fostering works that are remarkably thought-provoking without being pedantic or inaccessible. Their well-integrated series of single-volume works introduces the major religions (subtitled A Short Introduction), outlines their history (subtitled A Short History), provides biographies of their founders (subtitled A Short Biography), or gives access to topics in dictionary form (titled A Concise Encyclopedia of...). While the volumes vary somewhat in quality and length, they are all interesting and frequently offer new perspectives, at least for the lay reader. They also indirectly underscore the overlapping of the spiritual paths of the great religions. These two volumes are no exception. Klostermaier (A Survey of Hinduism) addresses "Hinduism" as a collection of indigenous Indian religions, myths, and modes of worship that have mutually influenced one another for millennia. He traces not so much the facts of Indian religious history as the development of the story and tradition of Indian spirituality through the development and transformation of myths about Indra in the Vedic period, through worship of Vishnu, Shiva, and other deities, to the complex responses of modern India to the inroads of Islam, Christianity, and colonialism. Klostermaier deals with controversial interpretations of history in a frank and careful manner. The works in this series of short histories include helpful chronologies, glossaries, and bibliographies. Ward's introduction to Christianity is surprisingly interesting, considering the array of literature about the faith. Ward (Regius Professor of Divinity, Oxford) enlightens through a short and chaste presentation of the major elements of Christian belief. Each motif is examined from three differing perspectives, treating each viewpoint fairly, with an apparent sympathy for the feelings of those who hold to each perspective. The result is an articulate presentation of diverse approaches to Christianity's central concerns. Ward's personal commitment to Christian faith is unfettered by any doctrinaire or close-minded approach. These works, and others in the Oneworld series, are highly recommended for college, public, theological, and personal libraries.DWilliam P. Collins, Library of Congress
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的排版和装帧设计,透露出一种古朴的怀旧感,但这种“古朴”似乎也蔓延到了内容的组织方式上。我注意到,书中对于不同学派之间的辩论和张力描述得不够充分。一个充满活力的思想体系,必然伴随着内部的争鸣和观点的碰撞,这些动态的过程恰恰是理解其生命力的关键所在。然而,此书的处理方式更接近于对既定教义的平铺直叙,仿佛所有观点都已达成共识,少了那种令人兴奋的、思想交锋的火花。我渴望看到不同诠释者如何“战斗”,如何发展出新的理解,而不是被告知“A如此说,B如此说”,然后戛然而止。这种缺乏辩证性的叙述,使得整个体系显得有些僵化和教条化,削弱了其作为一种活生生思想传统所应有的魅力和适应性。读完后,我感觉自己像是学习了一份静态的知识清单,而非掌握了一套可以应对时代变迁的思维工具,这对于现代读者来说,价值大打折扣。
评分坦白说,这本书的文字风格相当干燥,阅读过程需要极大的毅力和专注力。我曾试图将其作为案头的参考书,在需要查阅特定概念的定义时翻阅,但即便是这种功能性的使用,也常常因为检索效率低下而受挫。作者在组织材料时,似乎更倾向于时间线的线性叙述,而非逻辑主题的模块化划分。这导致了大量的概念在不同章节中重复出现,但每一次的重复都没有带来新的理解层次,反而造成了阅读上的拖沓感。我个人认为,任何关于复杂思想体系的著作,都应该致力于将抽象的概念具象化,通过类比、图表或其他辅助工具来降低读者的理解门槛。但在这本书中,我几乎找不到任何试图拉近作者与读者距离的努力。它更像是一份为同行准备的内部备忘录,充满了行业内部的行话和默认的知识背景。最终,合上书本时,我脑海中留下的不是清晰的知识框架,而是一片模糊的、关于某个宏大文明的碎片化印象,这与我期望得到的系统性知识构建相去甚远,实在是一种智力上的消耗。
评分翻开这本封面设计朴实无华的书,我原本期待能在这片泛黄的纸页间,寻到一些关于古代哲学思辨的深刻洞见,或者至少是某种结构严谨的理论梳理。然而,阅读的过程却像是在迷雾中摸索,每一个章节似乎都散落着零星的火花,但这些火花未能汇聚成燎原之势。作者似乎将太多的篇幅倾注在了对某些历史事件背景的冗长铺陈上,而这些背景信息的堆砌,非但没有有效地支撑起核心论点的构建,反而常常冲淡了本应聚焦的议题。我尤其对其中关于神话叙事的解读感到困惑,那些本该充满象征意义和精神力量的文本,在这里被分解得支离破碎,每一个象征符号的解释都显得武断且缺乏深入的文化溯源。读完之后,我感觉自己像是被带到了一座宏伟的宫殿前,但导游只顾着描绘墙壁上的灰尘和木料的纹理,却从未指引我进入核心的殿堂,去感受那股震撼人心的力量。这本书似乎更像是一份详尽的目录,列举了许多值得探究的主题,却鲜少提供足以令人信服的深度分析,对于一个希望系统性了解某一思想体系的读者而言,这无疑是一种体验上的遗憾。我期待的,是一种对复杂多面性恰到好处的平衡把握,而不是这种略显浮躁的片段式呈现。
评分这本书给我的整体感受是,它在细节的考据上投入了大量的精力,某些地方甚至达到了近乎苛刻的程度,引用的脚注和参考文献列表显得非常详尽。然而,这种对微观层面的过度关注,反而模糊了对宏观图景的把握能力。作者似乎更热衷于纠正前人观点中的细微误差,或者挖掘一些鲜为人知的地方性记载,却在构建一个清晰的、可供大众理解的哲学脉络方面显得力不从心。每一次试图从一个细枝末节跳跃回整体结构时,我都会感到一阵迷失,仿佛在茂密的丛林中辨认不出主要路径的方向。更让人遗憾的是,书中对现代社会与这一古老思想体系之间的关联性探讨几乎为零,它将研究对象彻底“悬置”在了历史的真空中。这本书更像是博物馆里的一件精美展品,需要专业的导览才能理解其价值,但它本身却未能提供一个足够友好的“入口”供普通参观者自行领略其深奥之美。对于一个渴望了解“这如何关乎我的当下”的读者来说,这本书提供的解决方案显得过于学术化和疏离。
评分初次接触这本书时,我被其引人入胜的开篇所吸引,那种语调,仿佛一位经验丰富的老者,准备娓娓道来尘封已久的秘密。然而,随着阅读的深入,我发现作者的叙事节奏似乎有些失控。某些关键概念,理应得到最精细的打磨和最清晰的界定,却被一带而过,仿佛是理所当然的常识,这对于一个初学者来说,无疑设置了重重障碍。举个例子,书中对“业力”的阐述,似乎更偏向于一种世俗层面的因果报应论,而非其在更深层次上的形而上学意义。而且,书中引用的资料来源也常常让人感到困惑,许多论断的支撑力度显得非常薄弱,常常需要读者自行去查阅大量外部资料来填补逻辑上的空白。我试着去捕捉作者试图构建的内在逻辑网,但发现那网线松松垮垮,容易断裂。这本书给我的感觉是,它试图囊括的范围过于宽泛,以至于在每一个领域都显得有些力不从心,缺乏那种一针见血、直击本质的穿透力。它更像是一本旅行指南,标明了各个景点的地理位置,却未曾深入描述每座山峰的独特地质构造和历史变迁的鬼斧神工。
评分这一本写的比较差,读起来非常干涩,有营养的信息也不多,少有的原创思想还很怪异!(比如印度历史分期)
评分这一本写的比较差,读起来非常干涩,有营养的信息也不多,少有的原创思想还很怪异!(比如印度历史分期)
评分这一本写的比较差,读起来非常干涩,有营养的信息也不多,少有的原创思想还很怪异!(比如印度历史分期)
评分这一本写的比较差,读起来非常干涩,有营养的信息也不多,少有的原创思想还很怪异!(比如印度历史分期)
评分这一本写的比较差,读起来非常干涩,有营养的信息也不多,少有的原创思想还很怪异!(比如印度历史分期)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有