Social science theories of contentious politics have been based almost exclusively on evidence drawn from the European and American experience, and classic texts in the field make no mention of either the Chinese Communist revolution or the Cultural Revolution - surely two of the most momentous social movements of the twentieth century. Moreover, China's record of popular upheaval stretches back well beyond this century, indeed all the way back to the third century B.C. By bringing together studies of protest that span the Imperial, Republic, and Communist eras, this book introduces Chinese patterns and provides a forum to consider ways in which contentious politics in China might serve to reinforce, refine or reshape theories derived from Western cases.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
還在翻譯中，爭取年內翻好，明年齣版.....
评分it occurred to me that eventually someone will win at the expense of someone's sacrifice, willingly or corecively. To remedy and to provide alternatives for voicing disagremeent, or else. Suppression is never a good way out.
评分裴宜理的書都很有可讀性。
评分it occurred to me that eventually someone will win at the expense of someone's sacrifice, willingly or corecively. To remedy and to provide alternatives for voicing disagremeent, or else. Suppression is never a good way out.
评分我還是不知道這種敘事中的曆史紋理在哪裏。對於我這個曆史小白倒確實是處處都有用的。predator與protector兩種類型的農民行動邏輯（似乎與某人那個“農民時時處於生存綫上下、時時有反抗可能，都是理性的生存所需”的argument一緻？）對我而言是全新的。抗爭是否能否cross-cutting對於理解輪子、知識分子、異見分子的所謂civil活動也有點啓發。依然不知道如何使用這些thoughts。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有