During the past fifty years, the Congresses and presidents of the United States have made many efforts to improve the performance of the federal government. In this book, a leading expert in public management examines the most important reform statutes passed and concludes that the problem is not too little reform but too much. Paul Light explains that Congress and the presidency have never decided whether they trust government and its employees to do their jobs well, and so they have moved back and forth over the decades between four reform philosophies: scientific management, war on waste, watchful eye, and liberation management. These four philosophies, argues Light, operate with different goals, implementation strategies, and impacts. Yet reform initiatives draw on one or another of them almost at random, often canceling out the potential benefits of a particular statute by passing a contradictory statute soon afterward. Light shows that as the public has become increasingly distrustful of government, the reform agenda has favored the war on waste and watchful eye. He analyzes the consequences of these changes for the overall performance of government and offers policy recommendations for future reform approaches.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
翻书党#美国公共行政变革的历史基本上就是在performance和accountability之间取平衡，平衡受到政治的影响，政治因素包括党派、选举、以及选民压力等。书写得简单，易读。梳理也算清晰。或可一读。
评分翻书党#美国公共行政变革的历史基本上就是在performance和accountability之间取平衡，平衡受到政治的影响，政治因素包括党派、选举、以及选民压力等。书写得简单，易读。梳理也算清晰。或可一读。
评分翻书党#美国公共行政变革的历史基本上就是在performance和accountability之间取平衡，平衡受到政治的影响，政治因素包括党派、选举、以及选民压力等。书写得简单，易读。梳理也算清晰。或可一读。
评分翻书党#美国公共行政变革的历史基本上就是在performance和accountability之间取平衡，平衡受到政治的影响，政治因素包括党派、选举、以及选民压力等。书写得简单，易读。梳理也算清晰。或可一读。
评分翻书党#美国公共行政变革的历史基本上就是在performance和accountability之间取平衡，平衡受到政治的影响，政治因素包括党派、选举、以及选民压力等。书写得简单，易读。梳理也算清晰。或可一读。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有