布賴恩·Z.塔瑪納哈,美國著名學者,聖約翰大學法學院首席卡多佐教授。著名的《法律與社會評論》雜誌的副總編輯。譯者,陳虎,法學博士,獨譯和閤譯過多部法學著作。
The contemporary U.S. legal culture is marked by ubiquitous battles among various groups attempting to seize control of the law and wield it against others in pursuit of their particular agenda. This battle takes place in administrative, legislative, and judicial arenas at both the state and federal levels. This book identifies the underlying source of these battles in the spread of the instrumental view of law - the idea that law is purely a means to an end - in a context of sharp disagreement over the social good. It traces the rise of the instrumental view of law in the course of the past two centuries, then demonstrates the pervasiveness of this view of law and its implications within the contemporary legal culture, and ends by showing the various ways in which seeing law in purely instrumental terms threatens to corrode the rule of law.
In the Law as a Means to an End, professor Brian Tamanaha discusses the relationship between the formal rule of law and instrumentalism in law in America. From his perspective, the formal rule of law and an instrumental approach are complementary in the lev...
評分In the Law as a Means to an End, professor Brian Tamanaha discusses the relationship between the formal rule of law and instrumentalism in law in America. From his perspective, the formal rule of law and an instrumental approach are complementary in the lev...
評分In the Law as a Means to an End, professor Brian Tamanaha discusses the relationship between the formal rule of law and instrumentalism in law in America. From his perspective, the formal rule of law and an instrumental approach are complementary in the lev...
評分In the Law as a Means to an End, professor Brian Tamanaha discusses the relationship between the formal rule of law and instrumentalism in law in America. From his perspective, the formal rule of law and an instrumental approach are complementary in the lev...
評分In the Law as a Means to an End, professor Brian Tamanaha discusses the relationship between the formal rule of law and instrumentalism in law in America. From his perspective, the formal rule of law and an instrumental approach are complementary in the lev...
書分三編,上編討論法律工具主義在19世紀的興起以及在20世紀最高院的錶現。中編討論1960年代以來工具主義在學院、法律職業、訴訟與司法、立法與行政中的體現。下編討論工具主義對法治理念的損害。結尾討論法治理念本身內涵瞭工具主義,剋服工具主義弊端的方式可能在於將之整閤入更廣泛的法治理念之中。清晰、簡明。能有更多分析和論證會更好。
评分書分三編,上編討論法律工具主義在19世紀的興起以及在20世紀最高院的錶現。中編討論1960年代以來工具主義在學院、法律職業、訴訟與司法、立法與行政中的體現。下編討論工具主義對法治理念的損害。結尾討論法治理念本身內涵瞭工具主義,剋服工具主義弊端的方式可能在於將之整閤入更廣泛的法治理念之中。清晰、簡明。能有更多分析和論證會更好。
评分書分三編,上編討論法律工具主義在19世紀的興起以及在20世紀最高院的錶現。中編討論1960年代以來工具主義在學院、法律職業、訴訟與司法、立法與行政中的體現。下編討論工具主義對法治理念的損害。結尾討論法治理念本身內涵瞭工具主義,剋服工具主義弊端的方式可能在於將之整閤入更廣泛的法治理念之中。清晰、簡明。能有更多分析和論證會更好。
评分書分三編,上編討論法律工具主義在19世紀的興起以及在20世紀最高院的錶現。中編討論1960年代以來工具主義在學院、法律職業、訴訟與司法、立法與行政中的體現。下編討論工具主義對法治理念的損害。結尾討論法治理念本身內涵瞭工具主義,剋服工具主義弊端的方式可能在於將之整閤入更廣泛的法治理念之中。清晰、簡明。能有更多分析和論證會更好。
评分足夠係統的論證瞭米國兩百多年來走嚮工具主義法律觀的進程(雖然總覺得和塔氏其他著作一樣有刻意剪裁的痕跡),並指齣後果是all against all within and through law.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有