This book is the product of a major British Academy Symposium held in 2007 to mark the centenary of the birth of H.L.A. Hart, the most important legal philosopher and one of the most important political philosophers of the twentieth century.
The book brings together contributions from eighteen of the world's foremost legal and political philosophers who explore the many subjects in which Hart produced influential work. Each essay engages in an original analysis of philosophical problems that were tackled by Hart, some essays including extended critical discussions of his major works: The Concept of Law , Punishment and Responsibility , Causation in the Law and Law, Liberty and Morality . All the main topics of Hart's philosophical writings are featured: general jurisprudence and legal positivism; criminal responsibility and punishment; theories of rights; toleration and liberty; theories of justice; and causation in the law.
H.L.A. (Herbert) Hart (1907-1992),was the son of a Jewish tailor of Polish and German descent. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School and New College Oxford, where he obtained a brilliant first class in Classical Greats. He practised at the Chancery Bar from 1932 to 1940 along with Richard (later Lord) Wilberforce. During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked in MI5. During this time his interests returned to philosophy and in 1945 he was appointed philosophy tutor at New College. He was strongly influenced by the linguistic philosophy then current in Oxford, but employed its techniques more constructively than did most members of the movement. In 1952, given his chancery background, he was persuaded by J.L. Austin to be a candidate for the Oxford chair of Jurisprudence when Professor Arthur Goodhart resigned. He was elected and held the chair until 1969.
From 1952 on he delivered the undergraduate lectures that turned into The Concept of Law (1961, posthumous second edition 1994). He also lectured on right and duties, but these lectures were never published. He held seminars with Tony Honoré on causation, leading to their joint work Causation in the Law (1959, second edition 1985). His visit to Harvard in 1956-7 led to his Holmes lecture on 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) and a famous controversy with Lon Fuller. Returning to the UK he engaged in an equally famous debate with Patrick (later Lord) Devlin on the limits within which the criminal law should try to enforce morality. Hart published two books on the subject, Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) and The Morality of the Criminal Law (1965). A wider interest in criminal law, stimulated by Rupert (later Professor Sir Rupert) Cross was signalled by his 'Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment' (1959). Nine of his essays on the criminal law were collected in Punishment and Responsibility (1968). In 1968 he was asked by Oxford University to chair a commission on relations with junior members, then at a low ebb, and produced a notably perceptive and constructive report.
Feeling that his powers were waning Hart resigned his chair in 1969, to be succeeded by Ronald Dworkin, a severe critic of his legal philosophy. He now devoted himself mainly to the study of Bentham, whom, along with Kelsen, he regarded as the most important legal philosopher of modern times. Ten of his essays were collected in Essays on Bentham (1982). From 1973 to 1978 he was Principal of Brasenose College. In his last years he was much concerned to find a convincing reply to Dworkin's criticisms of his version of legal positivism. A sketch of Hart's reply is to be found in the postscript to the second edition of The Concept of Law.
Hart's main aim as a lecturer and writer was to tell the truth and be clear. He was the most widely read British legal philosopher of the twentieth century and his work will continue to be a focus of discussion.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这是一部需要“沉浸式”阅读体验的作品。作者对语言的驾驭能力达到了一个近乎于诗意的境界,但这种诗意并非虚浮的装饰,而是为了承载更沉重的思想重量而存在的必要载体。他善于运用对比和张力来推进论述,将两种看似不相容的观点置于同一张画布上,然后展现它们之间微妙而又决定性的联系。阅读过程中,我仿佛置身于一个高规格的辩论场,作者是唯一的引导者,他引导我们质疑那些我们一直以来深信不疑的假设。书中的某些章节,其论证的精密度让人不得不停下来,甚至拿出笔来做思维导图,以理清那盘根错节的逻辑链条。它迫使你不再满足于表面的解释,而是深入挖掘事物运作的内在机制。这本书的价值,不在于它告诉了你“是什么”,而在于它教会了你如何以一种更具批判性和结构性的方式去思考“为什么会是这样”。对于任何严肃的思考者来说,这都是一本不可多得的良师益友。
评分这本书的篇幅厚重,内容密度极高,但令人称奇的是,它的可读性并未因此受损。作者的笔法极为考究,句子结构犹如精美的哥特式建筑,层层叠叠,却又保持着惊人的平衡感和清晰度。我发现自己不得不放慢速度,像品鉴陈年佳酿一样,细细咂摸每一个段落的内涵。他巧妙地将复杂的哲学思辨融入到生动的案例分析之中,使得那些原本高悬于理论殿堂之上的概念,一下子落了地,变得触手可及,充满现实的重量感。对我这个局外人来说,最大的收获在于,它提供了一套全新的工具箱,让我能够更有效地拆解和审视日常生活中那些看似天经地义的社会现象。书中对某些核心概念的界定和区分,细致入微,堪称教科书级别。这种对细节的偏执,最终汇聚成宏大的洞见。它不是那种读完后就束之高阁的书籍,而是那种会时不时地被翻开,带着新的体会和疑问,再次进入你日常思考的文本。
评分这部作品的文字力量着实令人惊叹,它像一条蜿蜒的河流,时而平静地流淌,时而激起思想的浪花,将读者带入一个错综复杂的概念迷宫。作者对于逻辑结构的掌控,简直是一门艺术。他没有急于给出结论,而是耐心地铺陈论据,步步为营,仿佛在构建一座精密的思想建筑,每一个砖块都紧密咬合,无可指摘。阅读过程中,我时常停下来,反复咀嚼那些精妙的措辞和严密的推导,那感觉就像是解开了一个古老的谜题,每一步的深入都伴随着“原来如此”的顿悟。尤其欣赏的是,作者在处理那些极具争议性的议题时所展现出的那种冷静而又富有洞察力的笔触。他似乎总能站在一个超然的制高点上,将所有对立的观点尽收眼底,然后用一种近乎外科手术般精准的手法,剥离出问题的核心。这种写作的成熟度,让人感觉作者不仅仅是在陈述观点,更是在引导一场深刻的、甚至有些痛苦的自我反思。全书的节奏把控得极佳,起承转合之间,自然流畅,毫无斧凿之痕,这使得即便是面对最为抽象的理论思辨,读者也能保持高度的专注和沉浸感。
评分读罢此书,我脑海中挥之不去的是一种近乎于清醒的震撼。作者的叙事风格极其大胆,他似乎毫不畏惧地挑战那些被奉为圭臬的传统观念,用一种近乎于挑衅的姿态,将我们习以为常的认知框架彻底颠覆。这不仅仅是学术论证,更像是一场对既有秩序的宣言式反抗。文字的张力贯穿始终,仿佛能触摸到作者笔尖下燃烧的激情。他使用的那些意象和比喻,既古典又充满现代感,常常一语双关,意味深长,迫使你跳出惯性的思维定势,从全新的角度去审视那些看似简单实则深不可测的概念。我尤其喜欢他那种对模糊性的坦然接受,他没有试图将世界简单地二元对立,而是拥抱了复杂性、矛盾性,并将这种复杂性转化为推动思考前进的强大动力。整本书读下来,感觉像经历了一场智力上的马拉松,虽然疲惫,但身体的每一个细胞都被激活了,对周遭世界的理解也变得更为锐利和多维。那种酣畅淋漓的阅读体验,在当今的学术著作中实属罕见。
评分初读此书,最先抓住我的是那种令人耳目一新的“新鲜感”。作者似乎完全不受任何既有流派的束缚,他的声音独特而鲜明,像是在一片沉寂的学海中投下了一块巨石,激起的涟漪久久未息。叙述的节奏变化多端,有时如同急促的鼓点,催促着读者跟上他飞速运转的思维;有时又像悠长的咏叹调,让读者有时间沉淀和反思。他处理语境和历史背景的方式尤为高明,并非简单地罗列事实,而是将历史的纵深感巧妙地融入到当代的论辩中,使得所有的论点都有了坚实的时代根基。我个人认为,作者在构建“反例”和“潜在反驳”方面的功力尤为深厚,他似乎总能预判读者的质疑,并在质疑升起之前,就以更强大的逻辑将其消弭于无形。这种预见性,体现了一种极高的思维成熟度和对自身论证的信心。这本书无疑是为那些不满足于现状、渴望深层理解的人准备的。
评分看了一半的文章,每篇都很棒,特别是菲尼斯和波斯特马的两篇。
评分看了一半的文章,每篇都很棒,特别是菲尼斯和波斯特马的两篇。
评分看了一半的文章,每篇都很棒,特别是菲尼斯和波斯特马的两篇。
评分看了一半的文章,每篇都很棒,特别是菲尼斯和波斯特马的两篇。
评分看了一半的文章,每篇都很棒,特别是菲尼斯和波斯特马的两篇。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有