具体描述
In the second half of the twentieth century – the years of the Cold War – Hungary was just another small state, limited in its sovereignty. This circumstance may explain why her State Security Organs were also limited in their scope and operations. The direct intervention of the secret service of the “Big Brother” – the Soviet Union – had a profound impact on its daily activities. Since Hungary had but a modest strategic importance in comparison to other Soviet satellite countries the noose around Hungarian society held by the network of agents was also looser than it was, say, in Romania or East Germany. The Hungarian professionals could even allow themselves the liberty, on occasion and in private moments (“we are among ourselves, comrades”) not to overestimate their own importance, to assess it the way colleagues from the outside might assess it: as a rather miserable little grocery store.
Yet in comparison to the victims of professionals in other lands, the contemporaries exposed to the activities of the Hungarian “secret servants” felt just as exposed as others. Tens of thousands of the victims of persecution did not have the luxury of assessing their own persecution in “historical perspective”. They had no reason to view their fate according to the site, on the basis of whether it unfolded in Recsk in the Mátra Mountains, in the delta of the Danube within Romania, or in some camp of the actual GULAG in the Soviet Union. In historical retrospect we can compare the reign of terror under Mátyás Rákosi when the ÁVH was the “fist of the party” to when, in the aftermath of 1956, the repression was administered by János Kádár’s Secret Police, held increasingly on a short leash, merely as the “eyes and ears” of the regime. Again it is because of our increasing awareness of the past that the lesson we learn is that, regardless of the minor or major changes within the regime, the missteps of the Secret Police were usually endured by ordinary persons who had aroused suspicion, for one thing or another.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
对于《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》这本书，我最深刻的印象是它所营造出的那种“时间感”。作者并没有急于推进故事，而是让时间在字里行间缓缓流淌。
评分读完《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》，我感觉自己好像在现实世界里又经历了一次人生的缩影。那些书中的人物，他们的挣扎、他们的无奈、他们的偶尔的欣喜，都让我感同身受。
评分这本书的标题《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》确实很容易让人产生联想。我一开始想象的是一个关于勤劳致富或者励志奋斗的故事，毕竟“大哥”这个词语往往带有一种坚韧不拔的意味。
评分这本《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》刚拿到手的时候，我还以为它会是一个关于经营的教程，或者是一个关于小人物如何在困境中挣扎的励志故事。毕竟“大哥”这个称呼，总给人一种扛起重担、顶天立地的感觉，而“杂货店”又充满着生活的烟火气，能让人联想到各种各样的人物和故事。然而，当我沉浸其中，我发现这不仅仅是一个关于一家小杂货店的故事，它更像是一面棱镜，折射出人性的复杂、社会变迁的无奈，以及在看似平淡的生活中涌动着的深刻情感。作者并没有刻意去描绘一个宏大的叙事，而是聚焦在那些细微之处，那些被日常琐碎所掩盖的情感和思考。
评分在阅读《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》的过程中，我时常会感到一种莫名的熟悉感，仿佛这些场景、这些人，就生活在我身边，或者就是我自己曾经的某个侧面。
评分这本书给我最大的触动，在于它对“普通”生活的细腻捕捉。我从来没有想过，一家小小的杂货店，竟然可以承载如此多的故事和情感。作者用非常朴实的语言，描绘了店主——那个“大哥”——的日常，从每天清晨的开门，到晚上关门前的整理，每一个动作都透露着一种近乎宿命的坚持。
评分关于《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》这本书，我的第一感觉是它非常“接地气”。“大哥”这个称呼，立刻就拉近了与读者的距离，让人联想到生活中的长辈、邻居，或者是某个你认识的，肩负着家庭责任的人。
评分当我拿起《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》这本书时，我并没有预设任何期待，更多的是一种好奇。一个“悲惨”的杂货店，这本身就充满了矛盾和张力。
评分读这本书的过程，对我来说是一次意料之外的“情感漫步”。我原本期待的是一个清晰的故事情节，或者是一个引人入胜的冲突。但《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》更像是一杯需要慢慢品味的茶，初入口时可能并没有惊为天人的感觉，但随着时间的推移，它的香醇和回甘会逐渐在你的舌尖绽放。我发现自己常常在阅读的间隙停下来，去回味作者描绘的那些场景，那些人物的对话，甚至是那些没有说出口的潜台词。
评分我必须承认，《大哥的悲惨小杂货店》带给我的阅读体验是相当独特的。它没有华丽的辞藻，也没有跌宕起伏的情节，但它却有一种“润物细无声”的力量，一点一点地渗透进我的内心。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有