The meeting of the Russian and Qing empires in the nineteenth century had dramatic consequences for Central Asia’s Muslim communities. Along this frontier, a new political space emerged, shaped by competing imperial and spiritual loyalties, cross-border economic and social ties, and the revolutions that engulfed Russia and China in the early twentieth century. David Brophy explores how a community of Central Asian Muslims responded to these historic changes by reinventing themselves as the modern Uyghur nation.
As exiles and émigrés, traders and seasonal laborers, a diverse diaspora of Muslims from China’s northwest province of Xinjiang spread to Russian territory, where they became enmeshed in political and intellectual currents among Russia’s Muslims. From the many national and transnational discourses of identity that circulated in this mixed community, the rhetoric of Uyghur nationhood emerged as a rallying point in the tumult of the Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War. Working both with and against Soviet policy, a shifting alliance of constituencies invoked the idea of a Uyghur nation to secure a place for itself in Soviet Central Asia and to spread the revolution to Xinjiang. Although its existence was contested in the fractious politics of the 1920s, in the 1930s the Uyghur nation achieved official recognition in the Soviet Union and China.
Grounded in a wealth of little-known archives from across Eurasia, Uyghur Nation offers a bottom-up perspective on nation-building in the Soviet Union and China and provides crucial background to the ongoing contest for the history and identity of Xinjiang.
David Brophy is a Lecturer in Modern Chinese History at the University of Sydney.
历史学四分 对于关注这个话题的人而言,历史材料上比较大的突破是同时引用了中,俄,土各方资料并综合成英语,方便这个话题的传播吧。要说更深入的,开创性的研究就不见得了。 —————————————— 民族学一分,我甚至想给零分 four paradigm,作者大概是比较倾向精英...
评分历史学四分 对于关注这个话题的人而言,历史材料上比较大的突破是同时引用了中,俄,土各方资料并综合成英语,方便这个话题的传播吧。要说更深入的,开创性的研究就不见得了。 —————————————— 民族学一分,我甚至想给零分 four paradigm,作者大概是比较倾向精英...
评分历史学四分 对于关注这个话题的人而言,历史材料上比较大的突破是同时引用了中,俄,土各方资料并综合成英语,方便这个话题的传播吧。要说更深入的,开创性的研究就不见得了。 —————————————— 民族学一分,我甚至想给零分 four paradigm,作者大概是比较倾向精英...
评分历史学四分 对于关注这个话题的人而言,历史材料上比较大的突破是同时引用了中,俄,土各方资料并综合成英语,方便这个话题的传播吧。要说更深入的,开创性的研究就不见得了。 —————————————— 民族学一分,我甚至想给零分 four paradigm,作者大概是比较倾向精英...
评分历史学四分 对于关注这个话题的人而言,历史材料上比较大的突破是同时引用了中,俄,土各方资料并综合成英语,方便这个话题的传播吧。要说更深入的,开创性的研究就不见得了。 —————————————— 民族学一分,我甚至想给零分 four paradigm,作者大概是比较倾向精英...
主要論點是維吾爾民族是兩種不同“故事”的交匯產物:1、與俄國穆斯林和奧斯曼知識界有關連的知識分子對突厥歷史的重新發現(伊斯蘭化和突厥化);2.蘇聯革命對新疆政治的影響(蘇聯化);作者也提出要將“新疆”與中國沿海口岸地區、跨境維吾爾人跟華僑做類比研究。看書後的徵引書目,除了漢英俄德法文之外,還有各類突厥系文獻。。(或許還有阿拉伯文?)。總而言之,這種研究不是一般人能做的。。
评分一部新疆维吾尔民族身份认同是如何诞生的历史叙述。
评分终于看完了,地名儿人名儿一脸懵。
评分终于看完了,地名儿人名儿一脸懵。
评分虽然很informative,基本上是从思想史的视角去看elites在帝国的“围剿下”的struggles如何最终帮助形成了uyghur这个民族。但是……我最大的收获大概是我不适合做思想史吧。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有