图书标签: 美国 美国革命史 历史 政治学 政治哲学 思想史 十八世纪 英国
发表于2025-01-09
The Royalist Revolution pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Generations of students have been taught that the American Revolution was a revolt against royal tyranny. In this revisionist account, Eric Nelson argues that a great many of our "founding fathers" saw themselves as rebels against the British Parliament, not the Crown. The Royalist Revolution interprets the patriot campaign of the 1770s as an insurrection in favor of royal power--driven by the conviction that the Lords and Commons had usurped the just prerogatives of the monarch.
Leading patriots believed that the colonies were the king's own to govern, and they urged George III to defy Parliament and rule directly. These theorists were proposing to turn back the clock on the English constitution, rejecting the Whig settlement that had secured the supremacy of Parliament after the Glorious Revolution. Instead, they embraced the political theory of those who had waged the last great campaign against Parliament's "usurpations" the reviled Stuart monarchs of the seventeenth century.
When it came time to design the state and federal constitutions, the very same figures who had defended this expansive conception of royal authority--John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, James Wilson, and their allies--returned to the fray as champions of a single executive vested with sweeping prerogatives. As a result of their labors, the Constitution of 1787 would assign its new president far more power than any British monarch had wielded for almost a hundred years. On one side of the Atlantic, Nelson concludes, there would be kings without monarchy; on the other, monarchy without kings.
Eric Nelson is Robert M. Beren Professor of Government at Harvard University.
细看去其实有许多车轱辘话。但问题意识是好的,把整个的宪制争论回归到王权派对论题的设定上,可以做为材料索引。尤其是把霍布斯的授权理论放在王权派脉络中解说,与其物理学结合,可以打开Authority解说之生面。
评分Yale Bookstore偶见即心仪之。八月断断续续读完,近日详做笔记。Nelson此书旨在勾出美国革命中隐蔽的“拥英王,反国会”思想线索。John Adams, James Wilson, Alexander Hamilton诸君自美革命初昌言之,后在1776年时因英王George III不予配合而受挫,但却又借Thomas Paine之力变相延续下来(此节最见作者思想史功力,不愧Skinner弟子),终于1787美宪中发扬光大。对理解美国制宪之主题以及总统制之思想脉络助益甚大。
评分细看去其实有许多车轱辘话。但问题意识是好的,把整个的宪制争论回归到王权派对论题的设定上,可以做为材料索引。尤其是把霍布斯的授权理论放在王权派脉络中解说,与其物理学结合,可以打开Authority解说之生面。
评分细看去其实有许多车轱辘话。但问题意识是好的,把整个的宪制争论回归到王权派对论题的设定上,可以做为材料索引。尤其是把霍布斯的授权理论放在王权派脉络中解说,与其物理学结合,可以打开Authority解说之生面。
评分Yale Bookstore偶见即心仪之。八月断断续续读完,近日详做笔记。Nelson此书旨在勾出美国革命中隐蔽的“拥英王,反国会”思想线索。John Adams, James Wilson, Alexander Hamilton诸君自美革命初昌言之,后在1776年时因英王George III不予配合而受挫,但却又借Thomas Paine之力变相延续下来(此节最见作者思想史功力,不愧Skinner弟子),终于1787美宪中发扬光大。对理解美国制宪之主题以及总统制之思想脉络助益甚大。
耶鲁大学法学院 吴景键 原文载于:上海书评(2018年12月) 原文地址: [https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2741721] 美国革命时期政治思想可谓美国史研究领域内最为经典的议题,名家辈出。然而近十余年来,由于缺乏新史料之刺激、学者视角开始转向底层与边缘等原因,...
评分[https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2019/05/24/%e7%8e%8b%e6%9d%83%e6%b4%be%e7%9a%84%e9%9d%a9%e5%91%bd/] 王权派的革命:美国建国的一种解读 埃里克·纳尔逊 / 吴景键 / 中国政法大学出版社 / 2019-4 子扉我 2019年春 季风异次元空间二世 原载[回响编辑部]微信2019年5月28日
评分[https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2019/05/24/%e7%8e%8b%e6%9d%83%e6%b4%be%e7%9a%84%e9%9d%a9%e5%91%bd/] 王权派的革命:美国建国的一种解读 埃里克·纳尔逊 / 吴景键 / 中国政法大学出版社 / 2019-4 子扉我 2019年春 季风异次元空间二世 原载[回响编辑部]微信2019年5月28日
评分耶鲁大学法学院 吴景键 原文载于:上海书评(2018年12月) 原文地址: [https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2741721] 美国革命时期政治思想可谓美国史研究领域内最为经典的议题,名家辈出。然而近十余年来,由于缺乏新史料之刺激、学者视角开始转向底层与边缘等原因,...
评分耶鲁大学法学院 吴景键 原文载于:上海书评(2018年12月) 原文地址: [https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2741721] 美国革命时期政治思想可谓美国史研究领域内最为经典的议题,名家辈出。然而近十余年来,由于缺乏新史料之刺激、学者视角开始转向底层与边缘等原因,...
The Royalist Revolution pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025