Drawing on startling new evidence from the mapping of the genome, an explosive new account of the genetic basis of race and its role in the human story
Fewer ideas have been more toxic or harmful than the idea of the biological reality of race, and with it the idea that humans of different races are biologically different from one another. For this understandable reason, the idea has been banished from polite academic conversation. Arguing that race is more than just a social construct can get a scholar run out of town, or at least off campus, on a rail. Human evolution, the consensus view insists, ended in prehistory.
Inconveniently, as Nicholas Wade argues in A Troublesome Inheritance, the consensus view cannot be right. And in fact, we know that populations have changed in the past few thousand years—to be lactose tolerant, for example, and to survive at high altitudes. Race is not a bright-line distinction; by definition it means that the more human populations are kept apart, the more they evolve their own distinct traits under the selective pressure known as Darwinian evolution. For many thousands of years, most human populations stayed where they were and grew distinct, not just in outward appearance but in deeper senses as well.
Wade, the longtime journalist covering genetic advances for The New York Times, draws widely on the work of scientists who have made crucial breakthroughs in establishing the reality of recent human evolution. The most provocative claims in this book involve the genetic basis of human social habits. What we might call middle-class social traits—thrift, docility, nonviolence—have been slowly but surely inculcated genetically within agrarian societies, Wade argues. These “values” obviously had a strong cultural component, but Wade points to evidence that agrarian societies evolved away from hunter-gatherer societies in some crucial respects. Also controversial are his findings regarding the genetic basis of traits we associate with intelligence, such as literacy and numeracy, in certain ethnic populations, including the Chinese and Ashkenazi Jews.
Wade believes deeply in the fundamental equality of all human peoples. He also believes that science is best served by pursuing the truth without fear, and if his mission to arrive at a coherent summa of what the new genetic science does and does not tell us about race and human history leads straight into a minefield, then so be it. This will not be the last word on the subject, but it will begin a powerful and overdue conversation.
Nicholas Wade received a BA in natural sciences from King’s College, Cambridge. He was the deputy editor of Nature magazine in London and then became that journal’s Washington correspondent. He joined Science magazine in Washington as a reporter and later moved to The New York Times, where he has been an editorial writer, concentrating on issues of defense, space, science, medicine, technology, genetics, molecular biology, the environment, and public policy, a science reporter, and a science editor.
1、主题不错,把基因、社会行为、社会建构联系在一起。但写的不深入,翻来覆去在重复。也许目前阶段没办法说深入,影响社会行为的基因有哪些?个体的社会行为如何影响群体的社会构建?只能提出一个理论,即社会环境(如定居、农业)构成选择条件,影响人群基因(如筛选出低攻击...
评分序: 尼古拉斯•韦德(NicholasWade) 英国剑桥大学国王学院自然科学学士。现在是自由撰稿人、记者,写了三部关于人类进化的著作:《黎明之前》—用基因技术颠覆史前五万年人类进化史;《信仰本能》—分析宗教行为进化历史;《麻烦的继承者》——探讨种族和遗传之间的关系。 ...
评分序: 尼古拉斯•韦德(NicholasWade) 英国剑桥大学国王学院自然科学学士。现在是自由撰稿人、记者,写了三部关于人类进化的著作:《黎明之前》—用基因技术颠覆史前五万年人类进化史;《信仰本能》—分析宗教行为进化历史;《麻烦的继承者》——探讨种族和遗传之间的关系。 ...
评分序: 尼古拉斯•韦德(NicholasWade) 英国剑桥大学国王学院自然科学学士。现在是自由撰稿人、记者,写了三部关于人类进化的著作:《黎明之前》—用基因技术颠覆史前五万年人类进化史;《信仰本能》—分析宗教行为进化历史;《麻烦的继承者》——探讨种族和遗传之间的关系。 ...
评分1、主题不错,把基因、社会行为、社会建构联系在一起。但写的不深入,翻来覆去在重复。也许目前阶段没办法说深入,影响社会行为的基因有哪些?个体的社会行为如何影响群体的社会构建?只能提出一个理论,即社会环境(如定居、农业)构成选择条件,影响人群基因(如筛选出低攻击...
把人类行为或者社会行为看成是文化影响下的基因内源的表现从科学上来看也是站不住脚的
评分其实我是赞同作者观点的,不过目前证据还是薄弱了些
评分立论没有问题,材料新意不足
评分把人类行为或者社会行为看成是文化影响下的基因内源的表现从科学上来看也是站不住脚的
评分把人类行为或者社会行为看成是文化影响下的基因内源的表现从科学上来看也是站不住脚的
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有