According to the dominant position among philosophers of language today, we can legitimately ascribe determinate contents (such as truth-conditions) to natural language sentences, independently of what the speaker actually means. This view contrasts with that held by ordinary language philosophers fifty years ago: according to them, speech acts, not sentences, are the primary bearers of content. Francois Recanati argues for the relevance of this controversy to the current debate about semantics and pragmatics. Is 'what is said' (as opposed to merely implied) determined by linguistic conventions, or is it an aspect of 'speaker's meaning'? Do we need pragmatics to fix truth-conditions? What is 'literal meaning'? To what extent is semantic composition a creative process? How pervasive is context-sensitivity? Recanati provides an original and insightful defence of 'contextualism', and offers an informed survey of the spectrum of positions held by linguists and philosophers working at the semantics/pragmatics interface.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
不管我從哪個角度看他，是站在RT的一邊還是DS的一邊，他一直都在我所站的位置的對立麵。語用學的小流派就是這麼微妙。
评分不管我從哪個角度看他，是站在RT的一邊還是DS的一邊，他一直都在我所站的位置的對立麵。語用學的小流派就是這麼微妙。
评分的確經典…
评分不管我從哪個角度看他，是站在RT的一邊還是DS的一邊，他一直都在我所站的位置的對立麵。語用學的小流派就是這麼微妙。
评分不管我從哪個角度看他，是站在RT的一邊還是DS的一邊，他一直都在我所站的位置的對立麵。語用學的小流派就是這麼微妙。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有