Herodotus's great work is not only an account of the momentous historical conflict between the Greeks and the Persians but also the earliest sustained exploration in the West of the problem of cultural difference. François Hartog asks fundamental questions about how Herodotus represented this difference. How did he and his readers understand the customs and beliefs of those who were not Greek? How did the historian convince his readers that his account of other peoples was reliable? How is it possible to comprehend a way of life radically different from one's own? What are the linguistic, rhetorical, and philosophical means by which Herodotus fashions his text into a mirror of the marginal and unknown? In answering these questions, Hartog transforms our understanding of the "father of history." His Herodotus is less the chronicler of a victorious Greece than a brilliant writer in pursuit of otherness.
評分
評分
評分
評分
法國古典學者阿爾托格關於“希羅多德”研究的扛鼎之作。研一下學期被當做古希臘史研究方法論代錶作進行討論
评分法國古典學者阿爾托格關於“希羅多德”研究的扛鼎之作。研一下學期被當做古希臘史研究方法論代錶作進行討論
评分“自我”與“他者”認同的開山之作。重看覺得自己之前的視角有些偏瞭,其實這本在希羅多德研究中的地位纔應該被重視。
评分法國古典學者阿爾托格關於“希羅多德”研究的扛鼎之作。研一下學期被當做古希臘史研究方法論代錶作進行討論
评分“自我”與“他者”認同的開山之作。重看覺得自己之前的視角有些偏瞭,其實這本在希羅多德研究中的地位纔應該被重視。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有