Rulin waishi (the unofficial history of the scholars) is more than a landmark in the history of the Chinese novel. This 18th-century work, which was deeply embedded in the intellectual and literary discourses of its time, challenges the reader to come to grips with the mid-Qing debates over ritual and ritualism, and the construction of history, narrative and lyricism. Wu Jingzi's (1701-54) ironic portrait of literati life was unprecedented in its comprehensive treatment of the degeneration of mores, the predicaments of official institutions, and the Confucian elite's futile struggle to reassert moral and cultural authority. Like many of his fellow literati, Wu found the vernacular novel an expressive and malleable medium for discussing elite concerns. Through a close reading of Rulin waishi, Shang Wei seeks to answer such questions as: what accounts for the literati's enthusiasm for writing and reading novels?; does this enthusiasm bespeak a conscious effort to develop a community of critical discourse outside the official world?; why did literati authors eschew publication?; what are the bases for their social and cultural criticisms?; how far do their criticisms go, given the authors' alleged Confucianism? ; and if literati authors were interested solely in recovering moral and cultural hegemony for their class, how can we explain the irony found in their works?
Shang Wei is Associate Professor of Chinese Literature, Columbia University.
那个年代的空间驰想 商伟 第一次听说恢复高考,是1977年的春天。那个时候,我正在福州城外的北峰分校“劳动实习。”除了早上偶尔上一两堂课,主要的时间都用在砍柴烧饭、春耕施肥。春天是雨季,山路经常打滑。一旦汽车进不了山,补给线就被切断了,我们只好吃咸菜下饭。可是,...
评分Parts 1 and 2 of this book show how Rulin waishi engages with elite ritual and historiographical discourses; parts 3 and 4 focus on the novel’s narrative innovation and its relation with literati identity. I’ll focus on part 1 in this note. This book d...
评分小说研究的路径与方法——商伟教授访谈录 杨彬 商伟教授,1962年1月生,吉林省延吉市人。曾就读于北京大学中文系,先后获得学士和硕士学位,并留校任教,后赴美国哈佛大学东亚系留学并获得博士学位。现执教于美国哥伦比亚大学东亚语言与文化系,任杜氏中国文化讲席教授。主...
评分本书第二部分第四章有一处错误。第204页第二段,“他(丁言志)买了一部诗集,据说收录了小说第12回所写的莺脰湖雅集上的诗作”,“丁言志开始向别人炫耀他的诗集,却因此陷入了一场关于诗集真伪的争论”。 按原著第54回,拥有这本诗集的人是陈和尚,他的父亲陈和甫当年参加过...
评分【内容提要】 对18世纪礼制转变的讨论似乎不应局限于思想史和观念史的思考范围,而应把它置于更复杂的制度与民间生活的互动网络中予以全面把握。由此,不但要注意礼制的内涵与明清思想转折的关系,而且也不可忽略这种转折与清朝帝王文化品味的诱导之间的关联性。通过对儒家“二...
读得不全,有几章读的是翻译。细读功夫是真好,“祖师爷赏饭吃”那种;能建构大问题,还能峰回路转,圆得巧妙。
评分思想史兼文本細讀。參看。
评分读得不全,有几章读的是翻译。细读功夫是真好,“祖师爷赏饭吃”那种;能建构大问题,还能峰回路转,圆得巧妙。
评分读得不全,有几章读的是翻译。细读功夫是真好,“祖师爷赏饭吃”那种;能建构大问题,还能峰回路转,圆得巧妙。
评分读得不全,有几章读的是翻译。细读功夫是真好,“祖师爷赏饭吃”那种;能建构大问题,还能峰回路转,圆得巧妙。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有