Manchus and Han pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 历史
- 新清史
- 海外中国研究
- 满族
- 中国近代史
- 路康乐
- 民族主义
- 民族-国家
- Manchus
- Han
- history
- culture
- ethnicity
- China
- nation
- tribe
- legacy
具体描述
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
作者简介
Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
目录信息
Contents
Illustrations
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1 / Separate and Unequal
2 / Cixi and the “Peculiar Institution”
3 / Zaifeng and the “Manchu Ascendency”
4 / The 1911 Revolution
5 / Court and Manchus after 1911
Conclusion
Notes
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
摘要：透过族群关系，路康乐提出了一系列问题：谁是满，谁是汉？义和团运动后革命党人是怎样批评满人的？在满人统治中国两百多年后，满汉到底有多大的区别？清政府是怎样处理这些批评的？满汉畛域是否有所弥合？关于汉满关系，清廷到底是有所作为或是无所作为而导致精英与之分...
评分Edward J . M. Rhoads , Manchus and Han : Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China , 1861—1928 ,Seattle and London : University of Washington Press , 2000 ,394pp. 2002 年4 月初在华盛顿召开的亚洲学会第54 届年会上, 宣...
评分清朝兴盛壮大于“反清复明”的呐喊，却挣扎沉沦于“驱除鞑虏”的口号。虽然都是打着“民族”、“华夷”的旗号，但前朝遗老与革命党人的命运却迥然不同。在清末民初的乱局中，“平满汉之界”的呼声响彻中国，但大部人却对满人内部的情况知之甚少。满人究竟是如何看待整个社会的...
评分摘要：路康乐著《满与汉》面世以来，广受好评。作者以“满”“汉”对立的视角得到了学界的甚高评价，但他忽视对概念的界定，遗漏满汉之外的其他族群和将满汉完全对立致有失真。该书的研究内容与所选研究时段明显分离，透露出模糊性而不便读者理解。自盖博坚并不确定地称该书为...
评分用户评价
相当棒，特别厉害，真的很喜欢
评分细节很多，但没有对满汉关系与清朝灭亡的关联提出什么新解释
评分相当棒，特别厉害，真的很喜欢
评分相当描述性的叙述方式，没有明确点出argument所以读起来有点累。讲了满族从一个军事职业群体向一个现代族群（在文化建构意义上）转变的过程。因为主要着眼于统治者的分类标准而非民间社会的认知和满人自身的身份认同，所以个人对这个thesis尚有疑问。结尾有两点很有趣：a)国民党将中国看作以“中华民族”为基础的民族国家，而这个“中华民族”的概念实际上与汉族无异，因为其他各族都被视为（应当）被汉族同化的群体；而ccp的意识形态则主张真正的“多民族国家”概念，事实上相对来说更加的文化多元主义；b.从五族到56个民族，为什么一些“少数民族”被进一步地细分（例如回族和旗人），而汉族始终是一个异质然而庞大的群体？（大概因为汉人是制定这个分类的主体吧，而分类的过程就是一个权力的场）
评分以满汉/旗民关系的角度梳理了晚清史。我看有人说不买账满/八旗文化对汉文化影响，我觉得这个我还是买账的，但我实在是不太买账这个旗人=满人的等号... 或许八旗文化很大程度上代表了满文化；最后八旗制度的废除是满族从一个military caste到一个ethnic group的转变；即使到清末很多满人已经不怎么会说满语，皇帝也不搞骑马射箭了；但是在八旗制度结束前满族人有明显的民族意识，且是一种独立于旗人身份意识之外的意识（即他们不同于且高于汉族包衣、八旗汉军，并且一定程度上保留民族特有的家人称呼、萨满信仰、亲母系等习惯）。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有