齐格蒙·鲍曼(Zygmunt Bauman, 1926- )当代最著名的社会家与哲学家之一,是“后现代主义”概念的主要创造者。他出生于波兰,曾任华沙大学社会系教授,1968年离开波兰,1969-1971年在特拉维夫和海法大学任教,后前往英国,任利兹大学终身教授,同时也在柏克利、耶鲁、堪培拉等大学任客座教授。主要著作有《阐释学与社会科学》(1987)、《现代性与大屠杀》(1989)、《现代性与矛盾》(1991)、《后现代性其不满》(1997)、《全球化:人类后果》(1998)。
Attempting to provide a sociological explanation of the Holocaust, the main theme of this work is the demonstration that the Holocaust has to be understood as deeply involved with the nature of modernity - neither a single event nor a simple outpouring of barbarism. The author discusses what sociology can teach us about the Holocaust, but more particularly concentrates upon the lesson which the Holocaust has for sociology. There are two ways, he points out, in which the significance of the Holocaust can be side-stepped in our understanding of modernity. One way is to present the Holocaust as something which happened to the Jews, as an event in Jewish history. A second way is to regard the Holocaust as representing loathsome aspects of social life which the progress of modernity will increasingly overcome. Neither of these views stand up to scrutiny, according to the author.
前几节将大屠杀研究的几个基本的论点结合史料都说的挺详细,算是这方面理论的“集大成”。可惜后两节加上那篇发言稿所提供的解决方案简直是terrible,而且那种方案不但不会遏制道德的无王状态(见发言稿)反而会助长“以理杀人”这种大屠杀模式。 本书前几节略述如...
评分前几节将大屠杀研究的几个基本的论点结合史料都说的挺详细,算是这方面理论的“集大成”。可惜后两节加上那篇发言稿所提供的解决方案简直是terrible,而且那种方案不但不会遏制道德的无王状态(见发言稿)反而会助长“以理杀人”这种大屠杀模式。 本书前几节略述如...
评分读鲍曼《现代性与大屠杀》 这本来是一篇作业,现在也就直接复制粘贴,带着浓厚的学院风,而且写得也不咋样,不过自认虽然啰嗦了一点,对文章的思路梳理地还是挺清楚的,大家且凑合着看呗。 鲍曼以严谨的笔调向我们揭示了一个严肃的问题:现代文明,就其内在的机制而言,存在...
评分若说大屠杀的造成是由于理性制度的衍生物而来,譬如与受害者的隔离、技术化、官僚组织运作等等,那么是否也可以说,如果我们试图通过同样这般冷漠的理性制度来给予众人幸福,其实也是一种徒劳与妄想?进而言之,不论是怎样的制度,奴隶的、君主的、民主的,或者社会主义的,只...
评分若说大屠杀的造成是由于理性制度的衍生物而来,譬如与受害者的隔离、技术化、官僚组织运作等等,那么是否也可以说,如果我们试图通过同样这般冷漠的理性制度来给予众人幸福,其实也是一种徒劳与妄想?进而言之,不论是怎样的制度,奴隶的、君主的、民主的,或者社会主义的,只...
社会心理学课必读书目。
评分"none of the societal conditions that made Auschwitz possible has truly disappeared"
评分"none of the societal conditions that made Auschwitz possible has truly disappeared"
评分Q:When one finds himself in a society wherein almost every condition that gave rise to the Holocaust could find its modern parallel, how should he feel and act? Is it merely historical contingency that prevents him from becoming complicit in the monstrosity that could materialize almost independent of his (and indeed, his fellow compatriots') will?
评分读完了换回英文版标(……)有几个段落可以收集起来写共产主义和恐怖主义问题(但我什么时候写我不知道),p177-183关于pre-societal道德问题有点意思,所以走的是李维纳斯路线。感觉其实想说的是新的本体论(which也是梅洛最后在找的)但是并没有到那个深度。总的来说还是没怎么超过大屠杀文学的水平,被老师按在我脸上要求读了就读了,没有惊喜。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有