Between 1974 and 1990 more than thirty countries in southern Europe, Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe shifted from authoritarian to democratic systems of government. This global democratic revolution is probably the most important political trend in the late twentieth century. In The Third Wave, Samuel P. Huntington analyzes the causes and nature of these democratic transitions, evaluates the prospects for stability of the new democracies, and explores the possibility of more countries becoming democratic. The recent transitions, he argues, are the third major wave of democratization in the modem world. Each of the two previous waves was followed by a reverse wave in which some countries shifted back to authoritarian government. Using concrete examples, empirical evidence, and insightful analysis, Huntington provides neither a theory nor a history of the third wave, but an explanation of why and how it occurred.
Factors responsible for the democratic trend include the legitimacy dilemmas of authoritarian regimes; economic and social development; the changed role of the Catholic Church; the impact of the United States, the European Community, and the Soviet Union; and the "snowballing" phenomenon: change in one country stimulating change in others. Five key elite groups within and outside the nondemocratic regime played roles in shaping the various ways democratization occurred. Compromise was key to all democratizations, and elections and nonviolent tactics also were central. New democracies must deal with the "torturer problem" and the "praetorian problem" and attempt to develop democratic values and processes. Disillusionment with democracy, Huntington argues, is necessary to consolidating democracy. He concludes the book with an analysis of the political, economic, and cultural factors that will decide whether or not the third wave continues.
Several "Guidelines for Democratizers" offer specific, practical suggestions for initiating and carrying out reform. Huntington's emphasis on practical application makes this book a valuable tool for anyone engaged in the democratization process. At this volatile time in history, Huntington's assessment of the processes of democratization is indispensable to understanding the future of democracy in the world.
Samuel Phillips Huntington (April 18, 1927 – December 24, 2008) was an influential political scientist from the United States of America whose works covered multiple sub-fields of political science. He gained wider prominence through his Clash of Civilizations (1993, 1996) thesis of a post-Cold War new world order.
He was a member of Harvard's department of government from 1950 until he was denied tenure in 1959.From 1959 to 1962 he was an associate professor of government at Columbia University where he was also Deputy Director of The Institute for War and Peace Studies. Huntington was invited to return to Harvard with tenure in 1963 and remained there until his death. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1965.Huntington and Warren Demian Manshel co-founded and co-edited Foreign Policy. Huntington stayed as co-editor until 1977.
可以训练的民主 评《第三波》 曾经有一段时间,《民主是个好东西》在中国的各阶层广泛流传,印证着这个国家开始改变一些执政观念,直到今天,“增量民主”依旧是为大家广为接受的一个改革方式,对于西方的先进理念应用于我们的国家,这是改革的一大进步。2008年的经济危机从西...
评分亨廷顿:《第三波:20世纪后期民主化浪潮》 A写作目的 试图对1974—1990年间的民主化浪潮发生的原因、方式、特征等加以分析阐释,并对民主化前景做出预测。 B研究方法 一套关于关键变项间关系的概括和理论,诸如政治权力与军事职业制,政治参与与政治制度化、政治思想与政治行...
评分“经济发展使民主成为可能,政治领导使民主成为现实。”这句本书最后一章的话成为了整本书的缩影。 亨廷顿是一个严谨的学者,从未把经济当说成“根本因素”,只是认为是“全面、重要的关联”,甚至在第二章第五节说经济发展对民主“不是决定性的”,但仍不能否定他把经...
评分《第三波:20世纪后期民主化浪潮》 亨廷顿的书的特色就是论证是薄弱的,也没有鲜明的、可靠的结论,但是观点往往很新颖,这些似是而非的结论也被证明有很高的预测作用和指导意义。亨廷顿的经验主义者和实用主义者。最伟大的自然科学家往往靠的是直觉,比如拉瓦西、拉马努金、费...
评分第三波——20世纪后期民主化浪潮.亨廷顿著.刘军宁译.上海三联书店.1998年10月第1版 前言 1. 本书目的:试图解释1974-1990年间这一波民主化的原因、方式及其直接后果 1 第一章 内容 一、第三波的开始 二、民主的含义 1.作为一种政体,民主一直是根据政府权威的来源,政府所服务...
manual for democratization, extremely inspiring, prophetic but still incomplete
评分My teacher asked me read this book -_- But i still messy..
评分My teacher asked me read this book -_- But i still messy..
评分not theoretically insightful perhaps b/c it's meant to serve as a practical guide for government to bring about democracy. points to the role of middle-class and civic society, similar to Putnam's conclusion but lacks his precision. certain culture elements (confucianism and islam) aren't conducive to democracy, which leads to his theory developmen
评分comparative politics 巨擘
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有