Description:
This book reviews the political development of Hong Kong before and after 1997, in particular the evolution of state-society relations in the last two decades, to analyze the slow development of democracy and governance in Hong Kong after 1997.
This book is a most comprehensive analysis of the multi-faceted changes in Hong Kong in the last 20 years. The scope of changes analyzed included state functions and institutions, political changes such as party development and development of the Legislative Council, and social changes such as social movements, civil liberties, etc. It helps the reader understand the crisis of governance of Hong Kong after 1997, and the difficulty of democratic development in Hong Kong over the years.
The book covers: changing state institutions in Hong Kong in the last few decades; party development in Hong Kong; the changing role and function of the legislature in Hong Kong; the evolution of social movement and movement organizational forms; media freedom, civil liberties, and the role of civil society; and theoretical discussions concerning governance problems and state-society relations in Hong Kong. Special emphasis is placed on how these changes brought about a new state-society relation, which in turn brought governance difficulties after 1997.
Contents:
Preface
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Chapter One Political Development in Hong Kong
PART A The State
Chapter Two The Nature of the Colonial State
Chapter Three Passages to the Post-Colonial State
Chapter Four The Post-Colonial State
PART B Political Society and Political Development
Chapter Five The Legislature
Chapter Six Political Parties
PART C Civil Society and Democratization
Chapter Seven Encroachments on Civil Society
Chapter Eight Civil Society in Self-Defense
Chapter Nine An Institutionalist's Conclusion
Appendices
1. Major Quangos Established since the 1980s
2. Major Judicial Review Cases, 2002-05
3. Examples of Criticisms from the Audit Commission, 1998-2003
4. Major Controversial Events Related to Civil Liberties after 1997
5. Coalitions, United Fronts, and Alliances, 1998-2004
MA Ngok got his Ph.D in Political Science at UCLA. He has previously taught at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and is now Associate Professor in the Department of Government and Administration at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. His research interests include parties and elections in Hong Kong, social movement and state-society relations in Hong Kong, East European transformation, elections, and democratization. His most recent book was Political Consequences of Electoral Laws: The Experience of the Hong Kong Proportional Representation System.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格有一种独特的魅力,它既有学者应有的严谨和精确,又不乏一种深刻的同情心。作者在描述那些充满矛盾和挣扎的政治参与者时,很少使用居高临下的批判口吻,而是努力去还原他们在特定历史情境下的无奈与选择的艰难。这种人性的关怀,使得冰冷的政治分析多了一层温度。比如,对于社会运动中年轻一代的参与动机分析,描绘得细致入微,让人在理解其政治诉求的同时,也能感受到他们身处时代洪流中的迷茫与坚韧。这种平衡感让这本书超越了单纯的政治学范畴,具备了更广泛的人文关怀价值。它迫使读者去思考,在宏大的政治变迁中,每一个微小个体的命运是如何被塑造和牵动的。
评分读完这本厚重的著作,我的首要感受是作者对于复杂情境的驾驭能力。它没有简单地将香港的政治局势归咎于某一个单一的因素,比如外部势力的干预或是某个特定群体的激进行为,而是提供了一种多维度的解释框架。这种解释框架非常精妙地平衡了宏观的历史趋势和微观的个体选择之间的关系。比如,书中对于不同代际的政治参与方式及其动机差异的分析,就极其生动地展现了社会变迁是如何重塑一代人的政治心理的。我特别欣赏作者在处理敏感议题时所展现出的克制与客观,他似乎在努力搭建一座桥梁,连接那些看似水火不容的观点,引导读者去理解“为什么会这样”,而不是简单地评判“对不对”。这种审慎的态度,让这部作品在众多的政治论述中显得尤为珍贵和耐读。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得极佳,读起来完全不像是在啃一部学术著作,更像是在跟随一位经验丰富的向导,穿越香港过去几十年间风云变幻的政治迷宫。作者擅长将那些晦涩的政治学理论融入到生动的历史场景之中,使得理论不再是空中楼阁。比如,当他讨论到协商民主的困境时,立刻会穿插进某个具体的立法会辩论片段,或是某次社区动员的细节,这种“理论入肉”的写作手法极大地增强了阅读的沉浸感。我发现自己对许多过去只在新闻中瞥见的事件,现在有了更深层次的理解——明白了那些看似突发的情绪爆发背后,是长期累积的制度性不满在起作用。对于想要系统性了解香港政治演化轨迹的读者来说,这本书无疑是一份极其扎实的地图。
评分这本书的深度和广度真是令人惊叹。作者显然花费了大量心血梳理了香港政治演变中的关键节点,从殖民地时期遗留下来的体制结构,到回归后社会各阶层对“一国两制”框架的理解与实践,都进行了细致入微的剖析。特别是对于不同时期关键人物的决策逻辑和背后的政治博弈,作者没有停留在表面的事件描述,而是挖掘了深层次的制度性约束和文化背景的影响。阅读过程中,我多次停下来反复思考作者提出的那些尖锐问题,比如在特定的历史条件下,社会期望与政治现实之间存在的结构性张力究竟是如何一步步累积并最终爆发的。它不仅仅是一部政治史,更像是一部关于权力、身份认同以及社会契约如何在一块弹丸之地上面临重塑的社会学观察报告。全书的论证逻辑严密,引用了大量一手资料和学界争论的焦点,使得即便是对香港政治不太熟悉的读者,也能迅速建立起一个清晰的知识框架。
评分从学术贡献的角度来看,这本书对既有研究范式的挑战是显而易见的。它不满足于对既有理论的重复验证,而是力图构建一套更具解释力的本土化分析模型。作者对政治文化和制度变迁的交互作用的探讨,提供了一个极具启发性的视角。尤其是书中对“治理合法性”在不同政治阶段如何被重新定义和争夺的论述,观点犀利,论据充分。读到这部分时,我不得不停下来思考,一个地方的政治秩序,其稳固性究竟来源于强力的执行,还是深厚的社会共识?这本书似乎倾向于后者,并详细论证了共识的脆弱性。总而言之,它不仅是梳理历史,更是在方法论上对我们理解当代政治动态提出了新的要求和可能性。
评分有闪光点 但是行文实在太罗嗦(典型香港学术风格)
评分有闪光点 但是行文实在太罗嗦(典型香港学术风格)
评分有闪光点 但是行文实在太罗嗦(典型香港学术风格)
评分有闪光点 但是行文实在太罗嗦(典型香港学术风格)
评分有闪光点 但是行文实在太罗嗦(典型香港学术风格)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有