Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was a visiting professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Chalmers is an associate professor at the History and Philosophy of Science department of the University of Sydney.
Books:
Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press and University of Minnesota Press, 1990, pp. 142+xii. (Translated into French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese and Chinese.)
What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd revised edition, University of Queensland Press, Hackett, 1999. (Originally published 1976; second edition: 1982.)
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Springer, 2009, pp. 288+xii.
写在前面: 这篇文章并非专为这本书所写,但确实是很大程度上受到这本书的影响才写的。是一组在写的文章之一。另一篇是:《“方差”漫谈之一:从人和猴子说起》(http://www.douban.com/note/256625376/)希望有兴趣的朋友能来交流指正~ 正文: 凭借一...
评分理论概论写得好其实很难,需要作者对学科内有史以来各类观点的深入了解和客观评估,加上作者自身的理论体系,为此教材类书的独创性增色不少,避免了泛泛之谈。Chalmers从1976年编写第一版科学哲学教材开始,至1998已更新到第三版。在科学学科内部日益走向专家化细分化的大环境...
评分否定实证主义(归纳逻辑)及否证主义的论证很精彩。库恩和拉卡托斯的理论,在我看来就像是以太,毫无用处,完全可以用奥卡姆剃刀给他刮的干干净净(什么都想说明,而又什么也讲不清)。无政府主义我很喜欢,但是作者有过度演绎无政府主义,甚至有些扭曲该理论的嫌疑(有太多矛...
评分怎么说呢,内容当然是不错啦。只是因为是考研制定的书,所以没有选择商务版的,从卓越上买会后,发现书真的很厚,不过字体真的比较大,这么多年没有看到过这么大的字体啦,字体间距也比较宽,好像是上小学时的语文书哈哈
评分怎么说呢,内容当然是不错啦。只是因为是考研制定的书,所以没有选择商务版的,从卓越上买会后,发现书真的很厚,不过字体真的比较大,这么多年没有看到过这么大的字体啦,字体间距也比较宽,好像是上小学时的语文书哈哈
你可识得此阵?
评分2011Fall TA
评分看完了以后真正觉得,科学基本上不需要哲学指导。中文版好多句子看不明白,爱问上的英文mobi版错段错句错词好多。
评分第一本英语书,虽然看过翻译的,可是读起来还是很吃力
评分科学哲学的经典导读书,行文精彩,容易理解。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有