Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was a visiting professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Chalmers is an associate professor at the History and Philosophy of Science department of the University of Sydney.
Books:
Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press and University of Minnesota Press, 1990, pp. 142+xii. (Translated into French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese and Chinese.)
What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd revised edition, University of Queensland Press, Hackett, 1999. (Originally published 1976; second edition: 1982.)
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Springer, 2009, pp. 288+xii.
科学哲学是对科学活动的反思。科学依赖于归纳,然而归纳虽然是实用的但是是不可靠的。然后有了波普尔的证伪主义,库恩的范式革命,拉卡托斯的研究纲领等等流派。 证伪主义的思路其实很简单,也很重要,是判定科学性的一个判据。就是看理论是否可能提出反例来,就是不能证伪的...
评分比较简单的科学哲学书籍,读的深入的话还是有所收获的,前几章非常清晰,后面批判归纳之后有些不如之前简明,可能因为问题也更加复杂了,或许由于出版时间关系本书只说道费耶阿本德,对于劳丹,邦格等没有叙述。
评分怎么说呢,内容当然是不错啦。只是因为是考研制定的书,所以没有选择商务版的,从卓越上买会后,发现书真的很厚,不过字体真的比较大,这么多年没有看到过这么大的字体啦,字体间距也比较宽,好像是上小学时的语文书哈哈
评分1 归纳主义 眼见为实 经验归纳的事实就是科学 (但事实不代表真相) 2 否证主义 可以校验是否正确的才是科学(但错了也许只是当时科学水平不够) 3 结构科学观 科学是围绕一个范式体系运作的(但太强调范式的重要性) 4 贝叶斯主义 科学不是绝对的东西 可以计算概率 对错都有可...
评分看完了以后真正觉得,科学基本上不需要哲学指导。中文版好多句子看不明白,爱问上的英文mobi版错段错句错词好多。
评分上哲学课的教材。
评分摆在手边太久没看,因为背景知识太熟无新意,这两天还是过了一遍,确保无生词。
评分方法论入门级,简单易懂。
评分理了一下对于科学态度和科学观的思路。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有