Chinese Characteristics (1894) was the most widely read American work on China until Pearl Buck’s The Good Earth (1931). It was the first to take up the task of analyzing Chinese society in the light of "scientific" social and racial theory.
Written as a series of pungent and sometimes comic essays for a Shanghai newspaper in the late 1880s, Chinese Characteristics was among the five most read books on China among foreigners living in China as late as World War I and it was read by Americans at home as a wise and authentic handbook. The book was quickly translated into Japanese and just as quickly into Chinese. It was accepted by the Chinese — and has maintained its authoritative status for over a century — as the quintessential portrait of the Chinese race drawn by a Westerner.
Lu Xun, the most prominent Chinese cultural critic of the early twentieth century, urged his students to study and ponder Smith’s message, which was very widely debated in Chinese student circles. Within the last decade (the 1990s), two different, new translations of Smith’s book were published in China and both editions have enjoyed wide distribution and readership. In the West, particularly since World War II, Chinese Characteristics has been widely quoted (though seldom read) as an example of Sino-myopia and Orientalism. Despite such Western pseudo-intellectual bias, Smith’s arguments retain the power to provoke critical introspection among Chinese and, for the honest, among Westerners as well.
Arthur H. Smith, D.D., was born in Vernon, Connecticut and graduated from Beloit College before serving with the Wisconsin infantry for a few months during the Civil War. A college friend called Smith an accomplished storyteller and "the funniest man I ever knew."
After he attended Andover Theological Seminary, in 1872 the American Board of the Commissioners for Foreign Missions sent him and his wife, Emma Jane Dickenson, to China. They lived in the north China village of Panjiazhuang for several decades, aspiring to fit in as "natives." Arthur Smith steeped himself in Chinese classical literature and folklore, leading to a stream of articles and books, including Proverbs and Common Sayings from the Chinese (1886; 1916); Village Life in China: A Study in Sociology (1899); and China in Convulsion (1901), a two-volume study of the Boxer Uprising.
刚刚看到这本书还是在图书馆闲逛时不经意看到的。没想到翻开就难以放下,用了一个下午的时间看了大部分。看过之后的感觉是不解渴。 抛开作者的某些主观偏见,研究对象的久远,基础资料的完备性,以及其他影响作者结论的因素;其书本身是一个将问题呈现的书,但未提出解决办法...
评分中国人,近百余年来,意识形态和统治阶层不停轮换,但其根本性格却一直根深蒂固,从未改变。所以,尽管此书写于上上世纪末期,100多年过去了,你仍会觉得,它写的竟然就是今天。
评分讨论中国人的民族性的声音多少年来不绝于耳,咱不说远的,就说说近一些的。无论是鲁迅、胡适、林语堂,还是柏杨、龙应台、三毛,当然,这都是明着说的。放在作品里说的就更多,金庸老先生从古代说,莫言从乡村说,钱钟书从知识分子身上说等等等等,但是,关起门来咱自家人...
评分现在看来,明恩溥的这本书应该叫做《19世纪的中国人》,里面说到中国人的很多特点,现在都趋于消失了。当然,在某些贫困落后的地方可能还会看到。 比如说到中国人节俭,使用任何一块布料,都能充分使之物尽其用。但现在,即便一个不那么喜欢炫富的人,都不可能节俭至此(家中...
评分满本的客观偏见,150年前这种思想水平的西方人应该算他们中进步的了吧,呵 呵
评分Very concrete writing.I know more about traditional chinese culture especially its dark &ugly side. It helps me understand more about the people around me.
评分有趣之处在于,许多来自西方的评价认为一来作者传教士的身份和有限的经历使书中的观点有失偏颇,二来时过境迁,书中内容早已不适合描述现今的中国;而很多中国人却认为,书中所描述的特性如今依然存在,仍然需要反思和自省。
评分如果要说文中的晚清人跟当代中国人有何相同之处,只能说都是穷过来的。
评分我至今还希望有人翻出史密斯(明恩溥)的《支那人的气质》(《中国人的气质》)来。看了那些,而自省,分析,明白哪几点说得对;变革,挣扎,自做功夫,却不求别人的原谅和称赞,来证明究竟怎样的是中国人。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有