Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli (3 May 1469 – 21 June 1527) was an Italian philosopher, writer, and politician and is considered one of the main founders of modern political science.[1] He was a diplomat, political philosopher, musician, poet and playwright, but, foremost, he was a civil servant of the Florentine Republic. In June of 1498, after the ouster and execution of Girolamo Savonarola, the Great Council elected Machiavelli as Secretary to the second Chancery of the Republic of Florence.[2]
Like Leonardo da Vinci, Machiavelli is considered a typical example of the Renaissance Man. He is most famous for a short political treatise, The Prince written 1513, but not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death, the same like another work of realist political theory, the Discourses on Livy. Although he privately circulated The Prince among friends, the only work he published in his life was The Art of War, about high-military science. Since the sixteenth century, generations of politicians remain attracted and repelled by the cynical (realist) approach to power posited in The Prince, the Discourses, and the History.[3] Whatever his personal intentions, which are still debated today, his surname yielded the modern political word Machiavellianism—the use of cunning and deceitful tactics in politics or in general.
The Discourses on Livy (Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livy) is a work of political history and philosophy composed in the early 16th century by the famed Florentine public servant and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), best known as the author of The Prince. Where The Prince is devoted to advising the ruler of a principality, i.e., a type of monarchy, the Discourses purport to explain the structure and benefits of a republic, a form of government based on popular consent and control. It is considered almost unanimously by scholars to be if not the first, then certainly the most important, work on republicanism in the early modern period.[1] Machiavelli dedicated this work to Zanobi Buondelmonti and Cosimo Rucellai, two of the greatest exponents of the Orti Oricellari in Florence, where aristocratic young people met in order to discuss politics, art and literature.
这部作品用大量的史实,赞颂罗马共和国的优良制度和罗马贵族、人民的德行。与近代作品相比,它不是建构在人文精神、道德的基础上,而是奠基于功利主义。马基雅维利绝不人云亦云,观察、剖析历史角度独特、深刻锐利,象一把锐利的手术刀,常有惊世骇俗观点,然而细细品味确有其...
评分 评分毁誉参半的奇书 聂文聪 巴克纳·比·特拉维克说:“人们经常断章取义以证明作者道德沦丧,这种做法对于马基雅维利的整个论题来说有失公平和公正。我们必须承认,他将国家利益提升到了个人利益之上。” 莎士比亚称这本书的作者为“阴险狡诈、口是心非、背信弃义、残暴无情的...
评分真正的德行只在危难之时显达;太平时代的得势者不是贤达,而是富贵门第。在太平岁月,共和国对伟人奇才视而不见,过去如此,今后仍将如此。在这样的时代,许多公民嫉妒他们因自己的德行而获得的威望,不想和他们平起平坐,而是要充当他们的上司。……共和国的这种弊病造成...
评分读的是Bantam Classics上的选载
评分Tarcov爷爷译的(o゚▽゚)o马基雅维利不停回收罗马史的例子(笑)
评分感谢中大图书馆,非常漂亮的原版书。可惜读马基雅维利实在是非常吃力。
评分补标一下去前花心思最多的书。一个吊诡的共和国,当讨论德性不再古典传统的品质性情,共和国的德性仿佛只剩下一张薄薄的纸。归根到底马基雅维利认为平民是又坏又蠢的,政治只是一场趋向于败坏的运动。在本科前三年给予我最大困扰和启发的不是柏拉图亚里士多德,也不是霍布斯卢梭,也不是马基雅维利的《君主》,而是这本诡异的《论李维》。
评分有机会细读全书。干净的语言,感觉比读更近一些的作品要舒服。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有