Oxford Philosophical Texts Series Editor: John Cottingham The Oxford Philosophical Texts series consists of authoritative teaching editions of canonical texts in the history of philosophy from the ancient world down to modern times. Each volume provides a clear, well laid out text together with a comprehensive introduction by a leading specialist, giving the student detailed critical guidance on the intellectual context of the work and the structure and philosophical importance of the main arguments. Endnotes are supplied which provide further commentary on the arguments and explain unfamiliar references and terminology, and a full bibliography and index are also included. The series aims to build up a definitive corpus of key texts in the Western philosophical tradition, which will form a reliable and enduring resource for students and teachers alike. David Hume's aim in writing An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1748) was to introduce his philosophy to a European culture in which many educated people read original works of philosophy. He gives an elegant and accessible presentation of strikingly original and challenging views about the limited powers of human understanding, the attractions of scepticism, the compatibility of free will and determinism, and weaknesses in the foundations of religion. Hume's philosophy was highly controversial in the eighteenth century and remains so today. The text printed in this edition is that of the Clarendon critical edition of Hume's works. A substantial introduction by the editor explains the intellectual background to the work and surveys its main themes. The volume also includes detailed explanatory notes on the text, a glossary of terms, a full list of references, and a section of supplementary readings.
休谟问题的最大贡献,就在于给哲学和自然科学提出了最具基础性的问题,因为他所质疑的,是知识大厦之所以能够伫立的最基础的地基。或许这个问题本身就是无解的,就像每个哲学家都在思考的“哲学是什么”或“人是什么”一样,答案永远没有找到的一天,对于地基的撼动似乎并没有...
评分初秋时去登山。青葱的山林中,一脉山涧顺势而下。我毫不怀疑这股清流将会绵延直至山脚,也坚信在不远的顶峰将会有这样的一个源头,活水不绝。即使在登顶之后,仍未见源头的一丝踪影,我关于源头的信念却不曾有丝毫的改变。 人类科学知识的进步何尝不像一条河流?基于环环相扣的...
评分他把怀疑论发展到怀疑任何人都不能确切地知道任何事的地步。休谟假设人类的知识只来自感觉而不是抽象的理性——“任何知识首先是感觉”——休谟认为我们无法确认这些事实是否与现实世界客观存在的事实相符。休谟形成极端的怀疑论之后,进而提出相对主义伦理哲学:如果我们不能确...
评分休谟的怀疑论完全以他否定归纳原理为依据,证明了纯粹经验主义不是科学的充足基础,归纳是一个独立的逻辑原理,是从经验或从其他逻辑原理都推论不出来的,没有这个原理,便不会有科学。 彻底的经验主义带来的两个推论 1,所有的知识都只具有一定限度内的确定性,世界并不如我们...
评分一直告诫自己莫要“以己之混混而令人之昭昭”,很少推荐书。但是今天读完大卫.休谟的《人类理智研究》,真心觉得是本好书。虽然是本哲学著作,但是休谟本人优美畅达(限于吕大吉的译本)的文辞,深入浅出,阅读中一点也不觉得他是在说很枯燥的哲学问题。我觉得大学生无论文理,...
key words还是那几个,实力论证empiricism~反正读起来还算有趣>>
评分图书馆的最旧的书,背面甚至还有借书卡。
评分两年前说,想要一间小屋,一张舒服的床,一套休谟,一只猫。现在都有了,但越发不知如何是好。代人立言本属僭妄,发微索隐更是不得定见,御人以口给,便争执无休,至于爬梳故纸,兀兀穷年,鲜能有益于学,遑论有益于人。唯有于四顾茫然之中,且尽杯中物。
评分两年前说,想要一间小屋,一张舒服的床,一套休谟,一只猫。现在都有了,但越发不知如何是好。代人立言本属僭妄,发微索隐更是不得定见,御人以口给,便争执无休,至于爬梳故纸,兀兀穷年,鲜能有益于学,遑论有益于人。唯有于四顾茫然之中,且尽杯中物。
评分Who's your fav philosopher? I do have an answer now.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有