This volume brings together Bourdieu's highly original writings on language and on the relations among language, power, and politics. Bourdieu develops a forceful critique of traditional approaches to language, including the linguistic theories of Saussure and Chomsky and the theory of speech-acts elaborated by Austin and others. He argues that language should he viewed not only as a means of communication but also as a medium of power through which individuals pursue their own interests and display their practical competence. Drawing on the concepts that are part of his distinctive theoretical approach. Bourdieu maintains that linguistic utterances or expressions can be understood as the product of the relation between a linguistic market" and it "linguistic habitus." When individuals use language in particular ways, they deploy their accumulated linguistic resources and implicitly adapt their words to the demands of the social held or market that is their audience. Hence every linguistic interaction, however personal or insignificant it may seem, hears the traces of the social structure that it both expresses and helps to reproduce. Bourdieu's account sheds fresh light on the ways in which linguistic usage varies according to considerations such as class and gender. It also opens up a new approach to the ways in which language is used in the domain of politics. For politics is, among other things, the arena in which words are deeds and the symbolic character of power is at stake. This volume, by one of the leading social thinkers in the world today, represents a major contribution to the study of language and power. It will be of interest to students throughout the social sciences and humanities, especially in sociology, politics, anthropology, linguistics, and literature.
评分
评分
评分
评分
磕磕巴巴读下来,最深的感觉同样是「文法教育真重要」(批的就是你们这种符号暴力的共谋啊!(欺师灭祖,捂脸逃走。
评分He raises a very good point for theoretical discussion with those materialists [you know who]. Why is it that, more often than not, the standardization of a language is the top priority?
评分这本书的英译其实挺糟糕的,从句套从句,成份并成份,非常不适合阅读。但是布迪厄的理论其实比这个译本本身好懂多了。有可能是我看得不怎么认真,我就是觉得他说的都有道理,但是理论可操作性不高。推荐序言、第一部分和第三部分。
评分布尔迪厄的文章真是写的太sophisticated。。。。绕来绕去,其实理解到的也就是语言不是自治的,语言也是一种资本,在市场中交易(其实这段我难以理解。。。。)Symbolic Power倒很好理解,通过艺术语言的形式做到一种权力和统治。。。。
评分布尔迪厄的文章真是写的太sophisticated。。。。绕来绕去,其实理解到的也就是语言不是自治的,语言也是一种资本,在市场中交易(其实这段我难以理解。。。。)Symbolic Power倒很好理解,通过艺术语言的形式做到一种权力和统治。。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有