具体描述
Modern philosophy of science has paid great attention to the understanding of scientific "practice, " in contrast to the earlier concentration on scientific "method." Paul Feyerabend's acclaimed work, which has contributed greatly to this new emphasis, shows the deficiencies of some widespread ideas about the nature of knowledge. He argues that the only feasible explanations of scientific successes are historical explanations, and that anarchism must now replace rationalism in the theory of knowledge.
作者简介
Paul Karl Feyerabend (January 13, 1924 – February 11, 1994) was an Austrian-born philosopher of science best known for his work as a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he worked for three decades (1958–1989). He lived a peripatetic life, living at various times in England, the United States, New Zealand, Italy, Germany, and finally Switzerland. His major works include Against Method (published in 1975), Science in a Free Society (published in 1978) and Farewell to Reason (a collection of papers published in 1987). Feyerabend became famous for his purportedly anarchistic view of science and his rejection of the existence of universal methodological rules.He is an influential figure in the philosophy of science, and also in the sociology of scientific knowledge.
目录信息
Preface to the Third Edition IX
Introduction to the Chinese Edition 1
Analytical Index 5
Introduction 9
Parts 1-20 14
Postscript on Relativism 268
Index 273
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
最近我重读了一遍保罗·费耶阿本德的《反对方法》，回头再看译者的那篇序言，不禁哑然失笑，又是验证了我关于中译本序言的一般看法：被否定的部分恰恰是人家的闪光点，而被肯定的部分则多半是误解与废话。下面我就结合序言中评价，来谈谈自己对此书中一些思想的理解。 ...
评分 评分单单从科学发展这一目的出发，为了这一目的，方法可以被抛弃，多元主义方法论应该被采取。科学不是发现，而是创造，需要放松、美感、想象、宣传、盲信、游戏、混沌、错误。理性不能解决所有问题，这一点我深以为然。 但是我觉得科学不只是一个寻求知识增长和理论创新的活动，它...
评分我下了一个英文版，是New Left Book1975年，1993年Verso第三次印刷的版本，和这个翻译版很不一样：有些英文版里有的这版没有，有一节这版有英文版整个都没有。也没有找到译者是根据哪个版本翻译的。而且有些地方要参看英文版才能看懂，有些乱。
评分我下了一个英文版，是New Left Book1975年，1993年Verso第三次印刷的版本，和这个翻译版很不一样：有些英文版里有的这版没有，有一节这版有英文版整个都没有。也没有找到译者是根据哪个版本翻译的。而且有些地方要参看英文版才能看懂，有些乱。
用户评价
Feyerabend真是个大毒舌。那种切中要害的bitchiness 实在是招人喜欢
评分作者反对波普尔学说, 认为科学不能被简单地归纳出统一的structure,rules or procedures, 科学不是只靠实证主义或reason/rationality发展到今天的. The only principle that does not inhibit progress is anything goes.作者反对罢黜百家, 独尊科学；是科学和现代思想发展到一定程度后的反思。 论述清楚；例证很值得一读。特别是关于伽利略和哥白尼革命的考证，从社会背景，学科发展水平到学者间的争论，全面翔实.
评分Feyerabend真是个大毒舌。那种切中要害的bitchiness 实在是招人喜欢
评分he wrote with a intellectual and compassionate tone. I wish I could say I understand the book but unfortunately I do not.
评分作者反对波普尔学说, 认为科学不能被简单地归纳出统一的structure,rules or procedures, 科学不是只靠实证主义或reason/rationality发展到今天的. The only principle that does not inhibit progress is anything goes.作者反对罢黜百家, 独尊科学；是科学和现代思想发展到一定程度后的反思。 论述清楚；例证很值得一读。特别是关于伽利略和哥白尼革命的考证，从社会背景，学科发展水平到学者间的争论，全面翔实.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有