The Logic of Collective Action pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Mancur Lloyd Olson, Jr. (pronounced /ˈmænsər/[1] or /ˈmæŋkər/; January 22, 1932 – February 19, 1998) was a leading American economist and social scientist who, at the time of his death, worked at the University of Maryland, College Park. Among other areas, he made contributions to institutional economics on the role of private property, taxation, public goods, collective action and contract rights in economic development. Olson focused on the logical basis of interest group membership and participation. The reigning political theories of his day granted groups an almost primordial status. Some appealed to a natural human instinct for herding, others ascribed the formation of groups that are rooted in kinship to the process of modernization. Olson offered a radically different account of the logical basis of organized collective action.
- 经济学
- 政治学
- 社会学
- 集体行动
- economics
- 社会理论
- 奥尔森
- MancurOlson
This book develops an original theory of group and organizational behavior that cuts across disciplinary lines and illustrates the theory with empirical and historical studies of particular organizations. Applying economic analysis to the subjects of the political scientist, sociologist, and economist, Mr. Olson examines the extent to which the individuals that share a common interest find it in their individual interest to bear the costs of the organizational effort.
The theory shows that most organizations produce what the economist calls "public goods"--goods or services that are available to every member, whether or not he has borne any of the costs of providing them. Economists have long understood that defense, law and order were public goods that could not be marketed to individuals, and that taxation was necessary. They have not, however, taken account of the fact that private as well as governmental organizations produce public goods.
具体描述
读后感
上“行政学经典著作和前沿问题”的博士生课需要阅读大量的文献，并从中学会研究问题的方法，今天课上重点讨论的是David M. Hart的《奥尔森理论的再验证》（Political Representation Among Dominant Firms: Revisiting the "Olsonian Hypothesis"），涉及到对奥尔森集体行动...
评分大致地看了一下奥尔森的《集体行动的逻辑》，总感觉着一直在围绕着一个主题——“利益”，各种各样的利益，无论哪种行为，最终都会被归结为简单的利益，这的确也是十分简单的道理，或许这与我们曾经接受过的一些东西发生了冲突，给人一种三观混乱的感觉，我不知道该如何评价他...
评分 评分奥尔森的这本《集体行动的逻辑》，是建立在理性人的假设基础上的。传统的看法认为“有共同利益的个人组成的集团通常总是试图增进那些共同的利益”，比如马克思的阶级观、民主国家中的“罢工”行为等。但是奥尔森教授从理性的“个体”展开研究之后，认为在大规模群体的集体...
评分转的。 我一直想不清楚工会的问题。认同经济学原理的人，基本都会认可，工会对于工人作为一整体的福祉是有害无益的。如果在劳动力市场上有许多剩余劳力，老板要是受不了工会了，只需要把工人全都辞退，雇一批新人就可以了（当然为此要付一点成本）。工会的作用，只不过给劳动力...
用户评价
翻来覆去就是说个很简单的道理。难得在说的非常好！
评分Bible for collective action study
评分懂了个大意。寒假前四章要仔细重读。一个观点很赞同：共同利益未必带来集体行动，因为当集体较大时，搭便车行为开始变得显著（说句俏皮话叫做三个和尚没水喝），若无选择性动机(selective incentive)，集体可能无法有效完成行动。Downs(1959)也讨论过类似问题，不过是从理性无知角度探讨的。小利益集团由于获利大，比平均分得利益较少的大集团更具有行动力也通常更有影响力，看爱荷华的农民就是一例，所以Mancur的讨论很有现实意义。同时认为意识形态决定的行为通常无法持久，似乎也有历史支持。是从一个非Huntington角度观察香港示威游行的实践理论机会。哈佛大学Trumbull教授的反驳很有趣，但具有合法溢价的合法联合是否能，在什么情况下能被动员还需看他的书才可再论。
评分其实是应老师的要求看其中的一章，但是写的还蛮好玩的我就去翻了全书。英文版很棒，读起来一点都不拗口，也没有很多生词XD 说是group，但是没有分析宗教组织哦，不知道是不是因为离理性的假设有些远。附录好看！个人觉得经济部分比政治部分有意思得多……【啊我的周末就这么没有了！
评分三个和尚没水喝...
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有