奧登的評論,可同時參考他的The Dyer's hand中的"The Shakesperian City”部分。他的評論比較重視基督教心理學對莎士比亞的影響。他對《威尼斯商人》的討論相當有意思。
評分
評分
評分
評分
#論文# 為瞭《馴悍記》的論文,簡單翻瞭一下。結果奧老師第一句:We shall not spend very much time on Taming of the Shrew. It is the only play of Shakespeare's that is a complete failure, though Titus Andronicus may be another. The plot of Taming of the Shrew belongs to farce, and Shakespeare is not a writer of farce. 然後就真的 隻用一頁半略過瞭這部作品...所以隻能算作一本非常personal的講稿吧。
评分#論文# 為瞭《馴悍記》的論文,簡單翻瞭一下。結果奧老師第一句:We shall not spend very much time on Taming of the Shrew. It is the only play of Shakespeare's that is a complete failure, though Titus Andronicus may be another. The plot of Taming of the Shrew belongs to farce, and Shakespeare is not a writer of farce. 然後就真的 隻用一頁半略過瞭這部作品...所以隻能算作一本非常personal的講稿吧。
评分#論文# 為瞭《馴悍記》的論文,簡單翻瞭一下。結果奧老師第一句:We shall not spend very much time on Taming of the Shrew. It is the only play of Shakespeare's that is a complete failure, though Titus Andronicus may be another. The plot of Taming of the Shrew belongs to farce, and Shakespeare is not a writer of farce. 然後就真的 隻用一頁半略過瞭這部作品...所以隻能算作一本非常personal的講稿吧。
评分#論文# 為瞭《馴悍記》的論文,簡單翻瞭一下。結果奧老師第一句:We shall not spend very much time on Taming of the Shrew. It is the only play of Shakespeare's that is a complete failure, though Titus Andronicus may be another. The plot of Taming of the Shrew belongs to farce, and Shakespeare is not a writer of farce. 然後就真的 隻用一頁半略過瞭這部作品...所以隻能算作一本非常personal的講稿吧。
评分#論文# 為瞭《馴悍記》的論文,簡單翻瞭一下。結果奧老師第一句:We shall not spend very much time on Taming of the Shrew. It is the only play of Shakespeare's that is a complete failure, though Titus Andronicus may be another. The plot of Taming of the Shrew belongs to farce, and Shakespeare is not a writer of farce. 然後就真的 隻用一頁半略過瞭這部作品...所以隻能算作一本非常personal的講稿吧。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有