On Tyranny pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Chicago. His many contributions to political philosophy include The Political Philosophy of Hobbes and Liberalism Ancient and Modern, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
- 政治哲学
- 施特劳斯
- 色诺芬
- 政治学
- 思想史
- 希腊
- Leo.Strauss
- L.Strauss
This work is Strauss' reading of Xenophon's dialogue, "Hiero" or "Tyrannicus", in which the tyrant Hiero and the poet Simonides discuss the advantages and disadvantages of exercising tyranny. This edition includes a translation of the dialogue, a critique of the commentary by the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, Strauss' restatement of his position in light of Kojeve's comments, and the complete Strauss-Kojeve correspondence.
具体描述
读后感
In his work On Tyranny, Leo Strauss close reads (between the lines) of Xenophon’s Hiero to suggest a divide between the philosophical and the political. Hiero, the tyrant, is provoked by Simonides, the wise man in this conversation on tyranny. At the same ...
评分这本书是关于色诺芬的《希耶罗》的解经论述，关于暴君统治的合法性与持续性的政治哲学辨说，也关于人的爱欲如何实现的心灵哲学发挥。但这都不是我想评说的，我看到更有意思的是施特劳斯和科耶夫通信中关于柏拉图和黑格尔的争论，给我们提供了关于人与信仰的更深的思考。 主要...
评分《论僭政》 p15 哲人和人民的调和是通过一种以引起对死后的恐惧的修辞家来进行的，哲人可以指导这些修辞家，却不能做他们的工作。 （惩罚、痛、罪感，延伸的阻止，机器） 在施特劳斯看来，说哲学是政治的，主要是就它的方式而言，在科耶夫看来，则同样是就其实质而言。（？） ...
评分In his work On Tyranny, Leo Strauss close reads (between the lines) of Xenophon’s Hiero to suggest a divide between the philosophical and the political. Hiero, the tyrant, is provoked by Simonides, the wise man in this conversation on tyranny. At the same ...
评分【摘 要】在《希耶罗》中，西蒙尼德诱使僭主希耶罗自己谈论了僭主生活的种种煎熬与不幸福，从而为我们展示出僭主事实上成为了僭政的奴仆这一现实。僭主作为城邦中拥有至高地位的奴隶，既无法享受普通人的知觉所能带来的快乐，又无法体会普通人的情感所能带来的享受，不啻于是...
用户评价
Brilliant interpretation.
评分這本書令我深刻的認為，自己根本從未讀懂過Plato的對話錄。
评分这本书让我知道陷入思想黑洞的可怕与享受
评分只读了通信和科耶夫的文章
评分只读了Hiero和文本解读，后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论，没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞，认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导，从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life，或者wisdom vs common recognition，进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure，二者冲突通过awareness of self-progress towards wisdom解决。第一次读controversial的施特劳斯，提出的问题很根本、也的确是现代社会忽视的，引人思考，但作者立场也没有彻底说服我。文本读得很细，特别值得学习。导读提到和科耶夫的争论在于哲人是远离还是改造共同体。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有